Re: [trill] Fwd: Nits on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 15 May 2012 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330139E800B for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KSFDFCYLQn3z for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BFD9E8006 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so2306299ggn.31 for <trill@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TZ0WlvYwp7Tw9ZdFLJe1sYAs5mCc2A51AUlKh8Gkkvc=; b=g6RgG3caYSH0bx2COU/Wi8zbEe27XPlbnEX1PYsKZFRxPn8s0T2eYeQu1cjTEgHWyW jzEkuJdpS/B1q2nkgwDQTazWZbPc+BE0lCzExO8yiNpzKwfpYQBKgiAsIw5iscS9FBcn 8rxuvSgqhDto2NGO44YDL83BAlyzY7xox/b6xm4bXpqEdl85KoapjW1chK8TKTolFm7l op6kZpUQxcAHJyZ1/ZE6AXDpob2XRW0Nrlsw4Yryo3DNxTvFKW4zlN1qcRusLEgTv83y y7Yt1+xXE/1wQ/D5XNvsM8VbgTBNsafk2eWNxe0JWpc0jYvST4tLQcyU0FYuQdTe8XnH muLw==
Received: by 10.42.176.6 with SMTP id bc6mr4961157icb.49.1337051898968; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.59.201 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 20:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FAD3E8A.3010206@acm.org>
References: <4F9A2DDA.1070009@acm.org> <4FAD3E8A.3010206@acm.org>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 23:17:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGB+094rpbgKJ1c=aLFHPo+Fgi6UhWq3LdLwXKJPdA-yA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] Fwd: Nits on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 03:18:20 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:
> FYI: I had sent these nits to the authors a while back.
> I think it makes sense to revise the draft to take care of the nits below,
> and then send it to the IESG.
>
> The "verbatim reproduction of the Inner Ethernet Header" should probably be
> left alone at this point in time.
>
> Regards,
>   Erik
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Nits on draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:25:46 -0700
> From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
> To: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-channel@tools.ietf.org
>
> Shouldn't this say something slightly different than MUST be zero?
>      CHV: A 4-bit field that gives the RBridge Channel Header Version
>            and MUST be zero.
> Something like "This document specifies version zero."

OK

> The verbatim reproduction of the Inner Ethernet Header in section 2.1
> means that this document would need to be revised as a result of things
> like fine grained labels. Wouldn't it make sense to instead do this by
> reference to RFC6325 instead of reproducing the exact header? That gives
> us the flexibility to have documents which update RFC6325 without
> touching this document.

As draft specifically discusses various fields in the Inner Ethernet
header including the VLAN tag, and as per your note above, I don't
think this should be changed.

> Section 2.2 tries to rename the Op-len field in the base protocol to be
> Ext-len. I think I commented on this being confusing and not worth-while
> for the extensions draft, thus I think the channel draft can use the
> same wording as the extensions draft (which does not attempt to rename
> the field.)

OK.

> Section 6.2 says
>   The IEEE Registration Authority has been assigned the Ethertype <TBD>
>   for RBridge-Channel.
>
> "has been assigned" should probably be "has assigned".
> Do we already have an allocated number to replace the TBD?

OK

> Typo: "particuclar"

OK.

Also, Vishwas Manral's email address in the Author Info Section has a
typo that should be fixed.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

>   Erik