IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Draft agenda uploaded

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 07 March 2018 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF42D1289B0 for <tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 10:33:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lhkGfRF-YoyQ for <tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 10:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10561120721 for <tsv-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 10:33:22 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=BSHJZnT51e9LQ6Pri2eQ5wtn3owHV4lPVSRfYrwHQx9oGZcjEoOyt13DlfYTizJThhkh4X8LGrOjynqhMb8HZMZiusEWOX8s3j7wi/qJXW1/wCju89KriWxAnxQGuOzhLxWKWcTI+TFLSCaniexZoLz+yyDvM5BygQcAPejDQJw=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 17799 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2018 19:33:21 +0100
Received: from i577bce46.versanet.de (HELO ?192.168.133.28?) (87.123.206.70) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 7 Mar 2018 19:33:21 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Subject: Re: Draft agenda uploaded
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34MuTi8_VUPnA3RujX=uDa0xD3O9W6NstkCwcYz-GPSJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 19:33:18 +0100
Cc: "tsv-area@ietf.org >> tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <422C01CA-890F-47BA-85FA-FB8526C72225@kuehlewind.net>
References: <9C1CE14F-46B8-4578-A0AA-8560B3F66635@kuehlewind.net> <CALx6S37nKN4amWYj1_QYq9nZjc1oBLt8cBP1z03SYMd+XE12Nw@mail.gmail.com> <3CAAE05C-1B86-4EC4-83E6-B407A7D31C2E@kuehlewind.net> <CALx6S34MuTi8_VUPnA3RujX=uDa0xD3O9W6NstkCwcYz-GPSJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20180307183321.17791.4765@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/I-vJkXYDV0SiuYvCTKJFSdu4qqI>
X-BeenThere: tsv-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Transport and Services Area Mailing List <tsv-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 18:33:25 -0000

No, I also wasn’t aware of this draft.

> Am 07.03.2018 um 19:12 schrieb Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
> <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> no, this is more a topic that we as the AD would like to discuss with the community as we see more and more work that adds TCP encapsulation to all kind of protocols for middlebox traversal issues.
> ).
> 
> So this is encapsulating protocols over TCP then (as opposed
> encapsulating TCP and other transports over UDP like in
> draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-01
> 
> Does this discussion have anything to do with STT
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davie-stt/)?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>>> Am 07.03.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2018 8:16 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> we plan to have a short (1h) TSV area meeting in London and are scheduled for
>>> 
>>> tsvarea Session 1 (1:00:00)
>>>   Monday, Afternoon Session III 1740-1840
>>>   Room Name: Sandringham size: 300
>>> 
>>> We just uploaded the planned agenda:
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-tsvarea
>>> 
>>> Besides the usual updates and status report, we are planning for a discussion about TCP encapsulation with a corresponding presentation about experience with TCP encapsulation for IKE.
>>> 
>>> Mirja,
>>> 
>>> Is there a draft or RFC for TCP encapsulation that is being discussed?
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> 
>>> 
>>> See you all in London!
>>> 
>>> Mirja and Spencer
>>> 
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email