IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] draft diffserv-intercon: Handling of a scavenger class / CS1

"Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu> Thu, 02 July 2015 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE4D1A88BF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCV1pHaubll5 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254E61A88D6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.71.26] helo=i72vorta.tm.kit.edu) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25 iface 141.3.10.81 id 1ZAg03-0004uW-EP; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:02:03 +0200
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by i72vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AFCB000EB; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:02:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5595526B.2010404@kit.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:02:03 +0200
From: "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, "Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de" <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>, "swmike@swm.pp.se" <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F50513613DD9@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1505292256170.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505136148FE@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949360B3798B8@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <5580C588.9070008@gmail.com> <538a059f43eb8a2c2bd42453de21d6f2.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506260829330.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F292B@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261011340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F2B1C@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261438350.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F2DFB@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290904460.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F2F2B@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493613FF1D0F@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493613FF1D0F@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1435849323.
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/-VRmZ72eo4BwRdyYr8vykLSzOkE>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] draft diffserv-intercon: Handling of a scavenger class / CS1
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:02:08 -0000

Hi,

Am 02.07.2015 um 02:32 schrieb Black, David:
> <WG chair hat OFF>
> 
>> - work on a scavenger class standard needs to be done in a
>>   separate draft.

...and as one of the original RFC 3662 authors I'd be happy to work on
it, too.

> And here's what that draft might encompass ...
> 
>   Beyond that, I'd support a (hopefully short) draft that
> 	- updates RFC 3662 to change the recommended DSCP for the LE PHB
> 		from CS1 to 000010,
> 	- recognizes and allows for continued use of CS1 where deployed, and
> 	- updates other RFCs (e.g., 4592, 5127) accordingly as needed.
> 
> As Brian pointed out, this would need to be a standards track draft with
> a downref to RFC 3662 in order to allocate that DSCP.
> 
> Writing the draft is straightforward by comparison to figuring out whether
> this is what we should do, as indicated by the other messages in this
> thread on operator/operational considerations.
> 
> This item is on the draft tsvwg agenda for Prague as a discussion topic - I
> plan to bring slides and only write the -00 draft after I've survived that
> discussion ;-).

Regards,
 Roland

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email