IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] draft diffserv-intercon: Handling of a scavenger class / CS1

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 17 July 2015 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBF41B3203 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 02:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ciAi_hLTj4tq for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 02:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C021B3204 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 02:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8DE7DA1; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1437125316; bh=VGpTWekA8weULmNjfJd2UZeRs3sWEMmFaCuG4m4PJHE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yaXwZVSt7x9+EpzlHBH9sseNIizrGjB4cFCCx0X1T9yYSr1mL0x+rg6yI5jDWWpnF cQImuksz5kTfEQyiReHWox81MFyiLjIwZGR/6akMz44jYNzzIbw8Z7h08z8uOiZ9BV noLAldgbug4jcB3JCrcPROo0hKcIcZ0bAIzq2aaU=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D509F; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:28:36 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507020914440.16442@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507171052520.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F50513613DD9@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505136148FE@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949360B3798B8@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <5580C588.9070008@gmail.com> <538a059f43eb8a2c2bd42453de21d6f2.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506260829330.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F292B@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261011340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F2B1C@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261438350.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F2DFB@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290904460.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F505290F2F2B@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493613FF1D0F@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507020914440.16442@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/jnQPdB2ULfUOALabJZW9Z2zXd8Y>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] draft diffserv-intercon: Handling of a scavenger class / CS1
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:28:43 -0000

On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> Any resulting discussion can be followed on 
> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2015-July/thread.html#77040 or 
> by subscription to the nanog mailing list (it's open to anybody).

There were very few public email, I received a few email offlist that 
voiced the concurring opinion that 000xxx was probably the most likely 
codepoint to be incrementally deployable.

However, my take is that not a lot of people are interested in this, but 
the few people that replied were also of the opinion that accepting 
anything outside of 000xxx from "The Internet" is a bad idea if one runs 
QoS internally.

So I don't see a huge amount of interest in this, but if we present a 
draft and propose something a bit more concrete, this might change.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email