Re: [tsvwg] draft diffserv-intercon: Handling of a scavenger class / CS1

["Black, David" <[e-mail]>]

Mikael - thanks for doing this; the information, including level
of interest, is useful.

There's a scavenger class item on the TSVWG Thu agenda - the
purpose is to discuss whether this ought to be done (or not).

Thanks,
--David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:29 AM
> To: Black, David
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [tsvwg] draft diffserv-intercon: Handling of a scavenger class /
> CS1
> 
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> > Any resulting discussion can be followed on
> > http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2015-July/thread.html#77040 or
> > by subscription to the nanog mailing list (it's open to anybody).
> 
> There were very few public email, I received a few email offlist that
> voiced the concurring opinion that 000xxx was probably the most likely
> codepoint to be incrementally deployable.
> 
> However, my take is that not a lot of people are interested in this, but
> the few people that replied were also of the opinion that accepting
> anything outside of 000xxx from "The Internet" is a bad idea if one runs
> QoS internally.
> 
> So I don't see a huge amount of interest in this, but if we present a
> draft and propose something a bit more concrete, this might change.
> 
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [e-mail]