IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] DSCPs and L4S: Label DSCP

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sun, 06 June 2021 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2FA3A3A25 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_t0JTZmGCZF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A8E3A3A23 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w15so17094085ljo.10 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 20:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9WxrPYZSDgG/+hTPXqdbRB6F2NfM/cDl1Wezu4R3egk=; b=q/IKnZt5k89BpW3REkS2tEF962q6IzkOXMhmAJNx206oAi4OpdN3NYq+eWTPm5ietL 6j+OH/lLcyx0vKwgWLDnddBSCoMwRo6uNQ8gggzHiZMuoYYnNtwp+ikGWIygUYexo3rj a0rEw6JA9GngOgqAJnG/Fm3byakO1FJ9wz74RGMoAARjEPAJ63QUsww+H9V9sNr82vcj lwPXkXvIRe7dQeBATMxNP+O8/Xh/jLIRQ1VHY+0ftd392G/IkxeHAvVgLpDIwEfMn9xB 7iqhvuq3kiu4UGT6vqe4AlgyHRvCfUHP8RlYnX3cNMLaPbizB8alFUx9QBd9zEpYbgMB Mi0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9WxrPYZSDgG/+hTPXqdbRB6F2NfM/cDl1Wezu4R3egk=; b=bzN3TD0tM9J/GP7CLXIW2pYkCyTeMqWL3BDaum7L7FPRI2fb4rYoVGBoI9MUpR8uiV YbIvm7ddvUHtqVyszxqm9Za0nfUp3YkQcBCBFR4sDqewnmKxatkheXZ1hZODiaPZLJ7g XoYD8GfRCxZ0JlaIGg9aVINhN62jzsUXdJERDzSIcsGNlVdQVolUYPt1cnUNXPGvU227 sRumTg7swjc8jTShSIYYefBa5KR7YfEAwro1RkN3zv1084fZ5TOyo4ExAWgr/13IiNGt +ykadFdnyYiRchb574MHWmGwRPTn9lPmGv43l1AYj/FNDpqZT2puWNWL+gJGUO/d39MC VHdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305knD9EAFfr8ibbQd11q++SCiXOtU9rCXdhRSiOxMsvQa7Eu5E QfD40JgjWt4AkKWp1/9HWzA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyENQnuQIUWwep2EOWLX0ZukCYftYfNGvug1Amag0j/44iTI/rIukq0WTfMkEiNXbkVqRuncA==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a603:: with SMTP id v3mr9803446ljp.175.1622950142964; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 20:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (87-93-133-133.bb.dnainternet.fi. [87.93.133.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm395609lfg.100.2021.06.05.20.29.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Jun 2021 20:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VFZo4kNGWsH3Q8K7miG6gyer8232M+5QyNSSL21XoZ4Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 06:29:01 +0300
Cc: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2AC8464D-9244-4AAF-978F-468B922FAB42@gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR19MB4045CC6F321E5B64B152FF0183229@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <CACL_3VHCQXV+yyg6PYCWxMF3wHOdQEap+vSd=s2-s07sWibKjg@mail.gmail.com> <ABA32E4C-325D-4961-986F-71D5F5E262C0@gmail.com> <CACL_3VFZo4kNGWsH3Q8K7miG6gyer8232M+5QyNSSL21XoZ4Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/-gGXHikOlqHYV-KAetXP0mS99L0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] DSCPs and L4S: Label DSCP
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 03:29:10 -0000

> On 6 Jun, 2021, at 1:08 am, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> I think it's clear that what is wanted by the L4S proponents is an experimental internet-wide deployment, not a set of isolated deployments. If the WG agrees, it should have the courage of its convictions and declare that RFC 3168 is obsolete.

To quote King Leonidas of Sparta:  "If."

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email