RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension

Barry,

That may well be, but for whatever reason, this 'orphaned' draft has
fostered implementations.  Change when there is interchange is still change
when there is interchange.  This draft could be recognized based on normal
merits.  Does anyone know why it has not been?  This does seem like an odd
situation.  What change to this draft is still required?

 -Doug

On May 8, 2002 12:09 PM Barry Nagelberg (Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com) wrote:
>
> Doug,
>
> Every ID states:
>
> "Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
> and MAY be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
> time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
> material or to cite them other than as 'work in progress'."
>
> Barry Nagelberg
>
>
> "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>
> Sent by: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
> 05/08/02 03:13 PM
>
> To: "Tsvwg" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension
>
>
> Michael,
>
> At the last Connect-A-Thon (worth 10 points for performance above and
> beyond) were three implementations that correctly performed U-SCTP and
> two implementations that handled the Add-IP/ASCONF draft.  Three
> implementations would seem sufficient for IETF consideration.  What
> changes were you expecting to make?  Any changes affecting operation
> under the current draft would be a setback from a compliance standpoint.
>
>  -Doug
>
> On May 8, 2002 7:32 AM Michael Tuexen (Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de)
> wrote:
> >
> > Doug,
> >
> > what do you mean by 'there is already interchange'?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael
> >
> > Michael Tuexen    Tel.:   +49 89 722 47210
> > Siemens AG        Fax:    +49 89 722 48212
> > ICN WN CC SE 7    E-mail: Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:                Douglas Otis [SMTP:dotis@sanlight.net]
> > > Sent:                Wednesday, May 08, 2002 4:26 PM
> > > To:          tsvwg@ietf.org
> > > Subject:             RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Why is a new ID needed?  There is already interchange with the current
> > > draft.
> > >
> > >  -Doug
> > >
> > > On May 8, 2002 6:49 AM Michael Tuexen
> > (Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There should show up a new ID for PR-SCTP soon.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > Michael Tuexen    Tel.:   +49 89 722 47210
> > > > Siemens AG        Fax:    +49 89 722 48212
> > > > ICN WN CC SE 7    E-mail: Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From:            Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com
> > > > [SMTP:Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com]
> > > > > Sent:            Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:31 PM
> > > > > To:              tsvwg@ietf.org
> > > > > Subject:                 [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode
> Extension
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone know what is the current state of the proposals
> > > > > that were in the Internet Draft titled "SCTP Unreliable Data
> > > > > Mode Extension" <draft-ietf-sigtran-usctp-01.txt>?
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Nagelberg
> > > > >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tsvwg mailing list
> tsvwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
>

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg