Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension

Barry:

I fully agree. drafts will change ... even though
these are fairly solid...

The new document should be out tommorrow for PR-SCTP (note
it is nolonger called U-SCTP)... it will be

draft-stewart-prsctp-00.txt

Note we blew it and failed to address it to the tsvwg... but
please all you tsvwg folks.. have a read tommorrow and provide
feedback..

Note for bakeoff goers.. there will be points awarded for
compliance to both this draft and the forthcoming -05 addip draft.

Hey.. I will even buy each team that has both working
at the start of the bake-off a good German Beer :-)

Best Regards

R

Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com wrote:
> 
> Doug,
> 
> Every ID states:
> 
> "Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
> and MAY be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
> time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
> material or to cite them other than as 'work in progress'."
> 
> Barry Nagelberg
> 
> "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>
> Sent by: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
> 05/08/02 03:13 PM
> 
> 
>         To:     "Tsvwg" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
>         cc:
>         Subject:        RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension
> 
> Michael,
> 
> At the last Connect-A-Thon (worth 10 points for performance above and
> beyond) were three implementations that correctly performed U-SCTP and two
> implementations that handled the Add-IP/ASCONF draft.  Three
> implementations
> would seem sufficient for IETF consideration.  What changes were you
> expecting to make?  Any changes affecting operation under the current
> draft
> would be a setback from a compliance standpoint.
> 
>  -Doug
> 
> On May 8, 2002 7:32 AM Michael Tuexen (Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de)
> wrote:
> >
> > Doug,
> >
> > what do you mean by 'there is already interchange'?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael
> >
> > Michael Tuexen    Tel.:   +49 89 722 47210
> > Siemens AG        Fax:    +49 89 722 48212
> > ICN WN CC SE 7    E-mail: Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:                Douglas Otis [SMTP:dotis@sanlight.net]
> > > Sent:                Wednesday, May 08, 2002 4:26 PM
> > > To:          tsvwg@ietf.org
> > > Subject:             RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Why is a new ID needed?  There is already interchange with the current
> > > draft.
> > >
> > >  -Doug
> > >
> > > On May 8, 2002 6:49 AM Michael Tuexen
> > (Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There should show up a new ID for PR-SCTP soon.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > Michael Tuexen    Tel.:   +49 89 722 47210
> > > > Siemens AG        Fax:    +49 89 722 48212
> > > > ICN WN CC SE 7    E-mail: Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From:            Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com
> > > > [SMTP:Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com]
> > > > > Sent:            Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:31 PM
> > > > > To:              tsvwg@ietf.org
> > > > > Subject:                 [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode
> Extension
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone know what is the current state of the proposals
> > > > > that were in the Internet Draft titled "SCTP Unreliable Data
> > > > > Mode Extension" <draft-ietf-sigtran-usctp-01.txt>?
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Nagelberg
> > > > >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tsvwg mailing list
> tsvwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg

-- 
Randall R. Stewart
randall@stewart.chicago.il.us 815-342-5222 (cell phone)

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg