RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension
"Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net> Wed, 08 May 2002 19:47 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21867 for <tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:47:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id PAA23641 for tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA22194; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:14:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA22164 for <tsvwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from c003.snv.cp.net (h023.c003.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.237]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id PAA20991 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (cpmta 5727 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 12:13:47 -0700
Received: from 64.130.130.105 (HELO littlejoy) by smtp.telocity.com (209.228.32.237) with SMTP; 8 May 2002 12:13:47 -0700
X-Sent: 8 May 2002 19:13:47 GMT
From: Douglas Otis <dotis@sanlight.net>
To: Tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:13:40 -0700
Message-ID: <NEBBJGDMMLHHCIKHGBEJGEAGDCAA.dotis@sanlight.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-reply-to: <F92978223B01D311ACFF0008C71EE19D015DF811@MCHH225E>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Michael, At the last Connect-A-Thon (worth 10 points for performance above and beyond) were three implementations that correctly performed U-SCTP and two implementations that handled the Add-IP/ASCONF draft. Three implementations would seem sufficient for IETF consideration. What changes were you expecting to make? Any changes affecting operation under the current draft would be a setback from a compliance standpoint. -Doug On May 8, 2002 7:32 AM Michael Tuexen (Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de) wrote: > > Doug, > > what do you mean by 'there is already interchange'? > > Best regards > Michael > > Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210 > Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212 > ICN WN CC SE 7 E-mail: Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Douglas Otis [SMTP:dotis@sanlight.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 4:26 PM > > To: tsvwg@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension > > > > Michael, > > > > Why is a new ID needed? There is already interchange with the current > > draft. > > > > -Doug > > > > On May 8, 2002 6:49 AM Michael Tuexen > (Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de) wrote: > > > > > > There should show up a new ID for PR-SCTP soon. > > > > > > Best regards > > > Michael > > > > > > Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210 > > > Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212 > > > ICN WN CC SE 7 E-mail: Michael.Tuexen@icn.siemens.de > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com > > > [SMTP:Barry.Nagelberg@radisys.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:31 PM > > > > To: tsvwg@ietf.org > > > > Subject: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension > > > > > > > > Does anyone know what is the current state of the proposals > > > > that were in the Internet Draft titled "SCTP Unreliable Data > > > > Mode Extension" <draft-ietf-sigtran-usctp-01.txt>? > > > > > > > > Barry Nagelberg > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tsvwg mailing list > > tsvwg@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg > > _______________________________________________ > tsvwg mailing list > tsvwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg > _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Tuexen Michael
- [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Barry.Nagelberg
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Douglas Otis
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Tuexen Michael
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Douglas Otis
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Barry.Nagelberg
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Douglas Otis
- Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Randall Stewart
- Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Randall Stewart
- Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll
- [Tsvwg] SCTP Partially Reliable Data Mode Extensi… Phillip T. Conrad
- RE: [Tsvwg] SCTP Unreliable Data Mode Extension Phillip Conrad