Re: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues

[Matt Mathis <[e-mail]>]

Does this conflict with
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-mib-extension-14.txt
(currently between states in IESG review).

The TCP Extended Statistics MIB also AUGMENTS both the tcpConnectionEntry and
tcpListenerEntry.    I am not enough of a mib person to understand how
multiple AUGMENTS clauses might interact.

Thanks,
--MM--
-------------------------------------------
Matt Mathis      http://www.psc.edu/~mathis
Work:412.268.3319    Home/Cell:412.654.7529
-------------------------------------------

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Anders Persson wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> During the v6ops meeting at IETF 66 we presented some issues with the
> current TCP and UDP MIBs, however, it was quickly pointed out that the
> TSVWG would be a more appropriate venue. The main issue that we are
> trying to address is how to present associations between system
> processes and TCP/UDP endpoints when there are multiple processes
> associated with one endpoint.
>
> A draft[1] is available that describes the issue and which also contains
> a first attempt at a TCP/UDP extension MIB. It would be highly
> appreciated if members of the TSVWG could help out reviewing this draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Anders
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/draft-persson-v6ops-mib-issue-01.txt
>
>