[Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues

Anders Persson <anders.persson@sun.com> Thu, 11 January 2007 19:06 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H55FQ-0003vm-MS; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:06:00 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H55FO-0003vS-C3 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:05:58 -0500
Received: from sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.25]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H55F3-0004GG-5I for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:05:58 -0500
Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com ([129.146.17.55]) by sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l0BJ5WQc004218 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [129.146.107.78] (d-mpk17-107-78.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.107.78]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BJ5W8s277783 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45A68ABA.9070501@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:06:34 -0800
From: Anders Persson <anders.persson@sun.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060925)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Everyone,

During the v6ops meeting at IETF 66 we presented some issues with the 
current TCP and UDP MIBs, however, it was quickly pointed out that the 
TSVWG would be a more appropriate venue. The main issue that we are 
trying to address is how to present associations between system 
processes and TCP/UDP endpoints when there are multiple processes 
associated with one endpoint.

A draft[1] is available that describes the issue and which also contains 
a first attempt at a TCP/UDP extension MIB. It would be highly 
appreciated if members of the TSVWG could help out reviewing this draft.

Thanks,
Anders

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/draft-persson-v6ops-mib-issue-01.txt