[Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues
Anders Persson <anders.persson@sun.com> Thu, 11 January 2007 19:06 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H55FQ-0003vm-MS; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:06:00 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H55FO-0003vS-C3 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:05:58 -0500
Received: from sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.43.25]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H55F3-0004GG-5I for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:05:58 -0500
Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com ([129.146.17.55]) by sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l0BJ5WQc004218 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [129.146.107.78] (d-mpk17-107-78.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.107.78]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0BJ5W8s277783 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45A68ABA.9070501@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:06:34 -0800
From: Anders Persson <anders.persson@sun.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060925)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Everyone, During the v6ops meeting at IETF 66 we presented some issues with the current TCP and UDP MIBs, however, it was quickly pointed out that the TSVWG would be a more appropriate venue. The main issue that we are trying to address is how to present associations between system processes and TCP/UDP endpoints when there are multiple processes associated with one endpoint. A draft[1] is available that describes the issue and which also contains a first attempt at a TCP/UDP extension MIB. It would be highly appreciated if members of the TSVWG could help out reviewing this draft. Thanks, Anders [1] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/draft-persson-v6ops-mib-issue-01.txt
- [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues Anders Persson
- Re: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues Matt Mathis
- RE: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues lars.eggert
- [Tsvwg] TCP Extended Statistics MIB, and v6ops TC… Kristine Adamson
- [Tsvwg] Re: [IETFMIBS] TCP Extended Statistics MI… Kristine Adamson
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: [IETFMIBS] TCP Extended Statistic… Matt Mathis
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: [IETFMIBS] TCP Extended Statistic… Anders Persson
- [Tsvwg] Re: [IETFMIBS] TCP Extended Statistics MI… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues Anders Persson
- Re: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [Tsvwg] TCP and UDP MIB issues Anders Persson