IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Submitted New Version Notification of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-08.txt

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Thu, 29 June 2023 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8E5C14CE39 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZjVx7oK0Adw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA6EC14CF13 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:630:42:110:51e7:6a5:4947:3a5a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:630:42:110:51e7:6a5:4947:3a5a]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 093241B0019B; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:37:02 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <f85676d8-d7be-1472-91b4-0e29ec432b1b@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:37:01 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <168776621151.56355.1233982918163924449@ietfa.amsl.com> <4e23d750-c907-15df-db81-fdcec398a515@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20230628144544.GA5987@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> <f93a01ce-4e1d-291e-7a13-28a675be2cda@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20230629163532.GA2848@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20230629163532.GA2848@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/3N1ZX1QZTAb68g3X8k1xvxo0bdQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Submitted New Version Notification of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:37:10 -0000

On 29/06/2023 17:35, Erik Auerswald wrote:
> Hi Gorry,
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 04:51:10PM +0100, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>> On 28/06/2023 15:45, Erik Auerswald wrote:
>>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-08 describes how REQ and RES UDP
>>> Options can be used to determine if DPLPMTUD probes have been received.
>>> It does not describe that padding probes to the intended size is
>>> realized using the minimum datagram length indication from section 13,
>>> "UDP API Extensions", of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-22.  Would the
>>> "Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options" draft be easier to understand if this
>>> were stated explicitly?
>>>
>> I think we could say something, would this seem a useful addition?
>>
>> https://github.com/uoaerg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud/pull/27/files
> That looks helpful, I do think this would be an improvement.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik

Then we'll merge that and the other edits to form a new revision.

Thanks,

Gorry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email