IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] UDP options and header-data split (zero copy)

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE083A08C2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n5RGkmJKHoDk for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03053A08CC for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8F2137E40 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 21:16:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=3BoWKP9EdC6tWj1XhLERKRjNsqT85rcH cVo405ylD+g=; b=bKADQ0mlBfiHlbdqK/fwbF1lKe3ekNMNew9zYkGHT8Te+LO0 ijVneqYWBDoZ7Y38lxBG5B87u1BTWHTbpldWnh0LmBRee7NXPEWNcNkUk+xqF2Gb QO13d1PwA1SiRWirD9JJ+QVPpLIUf0ZFWvAXGMHw573b6f9RPtuIiqRHOfA=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34899137E3F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 21:16:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (unknown [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0D1C137E3D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 21:16:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id q2so17797516plr.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2021 18:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rhY9e+yo+Yf2vHlVaBZkfA2NvUvLQHgjQM91eAOwwSHpKMDQa /EeuvMNjkxhJJk4lFND//XshnsH4XctT6zpIQnE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyb0s237HXss+MAuMeOYcZB0t6OwarExaEZOsLcaNb6/Dx4E1bUaUuqk8e6TdfITLsRsKCskzjfyqC4dbJev/E=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:a42:: with SMTP id z2mr2007743pgk.245.1627867000885; Sun, 01 Aug 2021 18:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <058C1360-D1BF-4C15-A0E3-D1C98DC8C45F@lurchi.franken.de> <04C250F8-7C10-4300-862B-7FFD739CA8B3@strayalpha.com> <C65F0BB6-BA2D-49F3-A473-32EEDF6C9467@lurchi.franken.de> <CALx6S36a66Ty6EUa9nRdvSQjaxepA7g1Np5T16iXuoTC3ZCd+g@mail.gmail.com> <48A4AB1F-A5E2-447E-8C20-AEC532269BFD@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S37wXiXhb9arG3BOw8RZUmGSX=a0KKKgS8MhyuKv52T+5Q@mail.gmail.com> <8EF9AB38-202D-4207-BCEA-24D65D208F09@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <8EF9AB38-202D-4207-BCEA-24D65D208F09@strayalpha.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 18:16:22 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VFRfSNsac=a_Jdd6KnoAxDUPNdRKJ5x0FOCUroA3e398A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VFRfSNsac=a_Jdd6KnoAxDUPNdRKJ5x0FOCUroA3e398A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000545f8105c8895262"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4B6CD5C6-F32F-11EB-A070-FA9E2DDBB1FC-06080547!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/BQ7M00NlmjvDoVAYh2-gihMdsVY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] UDP options and header-data split (zero copy)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 01:16:51 -0000

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 6:13 PM Joseph Touch wrote:

> However, that does not prevent use of UDP fragmentation - which would both
> be opaque to avoiding IP fragmentation and QUIC, as well as would traverse
> NATs because of the replicated UDP header in UDP fragments.
>

True, but QUIC has its own solutions to that problem. From recollection,
the comments I've seen from QUIC proponents is that there is no interest in
that quarter in UDP options.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email