IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options: on forcing the use of UDP CS=0 in connection with FRAG+LITE

"lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Tue, 02 July 2019 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B649112013B for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TC4c696pCuN for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic311-32.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic311-32.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.176.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC0E1200B5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1562040270; bh=v8dCDa0fBPGDzZrEUXyuFAd4a8p6LXI3dd3upRs6Fig=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=tcUQ22lqu+AOWLcGTI5z/4fU9QQEeO1sUC1ZIpJJpKywgKw58VikHJPBNuT9R0HB03NLhMAZU2grpS7Yr3BDIPxlQa2Wh81xNjU9N7Rw0pce4INBa7Xcx7egqWJuTJv70VpSu7rfCFqqEcPqde4oGVSwrynQDCBhBtNHR6aFeZnenalpFeQ1Y+QQrWnuMJw7m2jyOw2s3wmWJwWkFAYDkWrdgtsF0h4VBBOztkxT5aZASDVBrarZpFDvdgSUx1/BB874pw2ILhTdsU9QV5T/7FkJvTiAllYtCUWKY7Q+/hXFUQ377e0VIdbKmHR7akTeHs+39mblTGBLkT8n7m88wA==
X-YMail-OSG: xzx.pdkVM1nX0k9iJ7sUBCvRy..FvkjO8oNuQ3YWDxlY5c9Ei9K_y0M0o.USnCF 8oGLbBdLLGHWgpCE0gef9g9a_MvyjWl7qsWN.9yqSaT15zzx90KB9v6eX7rlJjMoYSCmm5QDJK6j SdKQejoESItV6Y4z589bgT7WrmYy5F1JakfFezilfp.bDsZyZI.Fb3dkAeRG460FLfPQHSXzYbU6 nm5bDt0xuIhw6mgV5dqz8aNYDwN890pUNNIAN.bWcHSqe_2vPltX2M_eGukiwskK5kUQ03gOHaGM Ovloa7Ztv8Ewm55DgpISr4t0GFQMlDnakI7GU5U0_wH8Gylf4IpCwFNUj3w23R8rqxNXK66CTdn6 16rj3czYjCJRl0UsJ9X_pNrcYHoqTb4ZSt8bLYarxDLdwte4tyFPBL60ZFb8LFm789Kez75Hm50V Xi5vxyLNK30bs29oo.dXj_Ohjs3vmn.nY367K9hab97lG4tuEQONIHkP8uS2ZKj9p15cw7XgqovR EvMk9IAQh2QZmAIV3tj8mFan0BHxrb0YS.vx_PHMzi9DgsO2PT75skU4LnX_eaNdvgTt6U5aPTJi yDWBHwr5rUB0fOocy1v_98F7C.L6hk5CKgzGz2fEt4p7jDdSuPtiPKQtrxw8gqkQRJy2OLp.0deZ 81x_7XFRdFsN.xeU02MO9JvHfan6uLDDMB1sQeCjr5FRAWNoV_iI5UYjjNq_jGbD7Rdy8tYM6t7c Z_TTq_S3Rmg_JfmqXAFbCAbTp2scI5huITleUXm_cRIHotXouV0fHIsxsTBSIyTAkfVHWxFWvQrp syBmqkLSmBdw3nOIS9Hr8shL2wm1KIxgMwKZNUW7spv38BsT3rGJTiNGcMd6AU1W70_WruQ2WzIN hENpWRUKPcB3YACBIRctbW2C_Fxo2Kx20dYBDjHu6MzTofnoQJbWqSmVgjBkHq0mR5XmjqLbQkev 63RzgjTert08ai3nF5gFSV7MCx2sHJTFTnc71j5LbCq7vlCtSGoRt2UWn3NtbGefRzrqlj2FEY.c 0p70fJjH70iq_61RKmXdVBxZ51Q9XYXdMDHESlspqHnmVHXOy09O_z9URtSItbX7AWczkrlmX.OP q6lmv2ndxpbW8Vt5KO7FD3N2FXdP066WReGETla6Ile44D2hilSZoIMQ2Q84uH9QquYu1LG98hne mOqEBjBmyTNIe_7Mj7Qa4huB9jIJMQUKS8LvONVtN_6dOpfLkimXabAjNZfd4bBXVQXKHws8N0d6 PkgnFtVz.NOmi6FC7ZEDGM28ZftqN
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 04:04:30 +0000
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 04:04:27 +0000
From: "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1382139484.1775281.1562040267133@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34kQ-ziqiSniqQeFTHvHb+4J6e6rKaURJW0ZJMo=q-h+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACL_3VHGtMz3htgfFLRGhjXm=qC7kOXQs+cchtamhh-giBnpLA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35T9ApzMaoSVgHSJPpcpfXsbHHogoBbEjMPj6vH-kxYeA@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VE6kr33Vk5si5AxSZNmhqysZZGoy6HK37COUgwbvcRkdA@mail.gmail.com> <24692A9B-4AF1-4E32-A760-7D4908A61262@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VExhAdFCu-kFLLO5DeRYUOFyJztUgJg-vQmnPoecvzeJg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34zY74fhqbXxmiyturfu5mxFjRtA4=R48haX9tP6qLcow@mail.gmail.com> <A1C8FAD8-E189-410F-A6AD-D6F53E486BAE@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S342eWaXY4F_4fJxSpHSyVfGongbSVYoEZASOPS8rLAT6g@mail.gmail.com> <6A7811E6-9C7C-4BA6-B183-D03AE7100038@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S34kQ-ziqiSniqQeFTHvHb+4J6e6rKaURJW0ZJMo=q-h+Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.13913 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/67.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/CA8f8U8HUao_OC8nX71sWzIePg8>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options: on forcing the use of UDP CS=0 in connection with FRAG+LITE
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 04:04:34 -0000

That's too low.

I'd want more zero-checksum UDP packets to be dropped at AS boundaries.

No checksum, no entry.

Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk http://about.me/lloydwood






On Tuesday, 2 July 2019, 11:12:44 GMT+10, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote: 





On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:40 PM Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>
> .
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 5:35 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
>
> >> So why would not including these fields matter?
> >
> > Because it matters to UDPv6.
>
> In a world with NATs that recalc CSs, it doesn’t.  It just checks that the NAT sw implemented the update.
>
Is that the same world where 24-36% of paths drop UDPv6 packets with
zero checksums as Mike reported?


Tom

> Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email