Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options: on forcing the use of UDP CS=0 in connection with FRAG+LITE

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 02 July 2019 01:55 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1C012018F for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6A2BtR1PHchb for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F18C12018B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Fle1g6zIAChnvUhHNg/nUYPynyPjvEHJOBMG0IwuuFE=; b=iTHKm3blmZM0zZ7YojSopvUzl X0vbMJG6qojQzXvZcBCO0LtIcUWF/o89XmaLnBNVg9Clmwc81nEE5A02eEsc3u3S2/FHiYK8+itkn jj2aWbQSohqR+WCyjJd7la/xkjxhiPM/BH3vgdnlJeUlBdgqVKy0yMDbkrX0Z8f38jmQ0DubZ4YnE QT3E76k6oWGmN6G+z0y9VaXug1n0lMw36h0hPrWb0kiphQGIKOZ3NvNymFDN7LFccy9hV44zSA/YD Hbww6KOqizF3A6/PMB1oBu7HHZH8WOjnl2rabGY7RsKGmw9w2LiPH90sAXwmfEUnBGYduz1ptGuPw xmKJ37IdQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:60505 helo=[192.168.1.16]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1hi80c-004FJ2-LB; Mon, 01 Jul 2019 21:55:17 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16F203)
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VF4XiRyS7Nc=eSE-ec+qGo6Xkc3syE+iGXxXPPN=eOpWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 18:55:02 -0700
Cc: TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C4FD7B8E-E05A-48EA-8F3A-8D91473172FB@strayalpha.com>
References: <CACL_3VHGtMz3htgfFLRGhjXm=qC7kOXQs+cchtamhh-giBnpLA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35T9ApzMaoSVgHSJPpcpfXsbHHogoBbEjMPj6vH-kxYeA@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VE6kr33Vk5si5AxSZNmhqysZZGoy6HK37COUgwbvcRkdA@mail.gmail.com> <24692A9B-4AF1-4E32-A760-7D4908A61262@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VExhAdFCu-kFLLO5DeRYUOFyJztUgJg-vQmnPoecvzeJg@mail.gmail.com> <6DB954BC-8D40-4347-A172-C00FED1AE4AF@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VF38oR7emB0K6yrL7Npj4eb-Q-KFVu3=7L66syGaTrJtA@mail.gmail.com> <3E9DF9F3-EEBF-4C74-9633-A8E4ED1B5C01@strayalpha.com> <2977F9B1-73F3-4718-B65D-074EFED848AF@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VHnVkSNXZoNzYBXX4jSGQuv1NL9UMf=j9YTXLmVb4Oq8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2720454F-8C4E-4C34-B326-C208ECD348A4@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VF4XiRyS7Nc=eSE-ec+qGo6Xkc3syE+iGXxXPPN=eOpWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/H5aE0TMtB_EUxZj2h-dzCxynGQU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options: on forcing the use of UDP CS=0 in connection with FRAG+LITE
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 01:55:28 -0000


> On Jul 1, 2019, at 5:42 PM, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> The original complaint was:
> 
>> The solution below doesn't appear to avoid copying/moving large amounts
>> of data.
>> 
>> At a minimum, can you address #2? If we can do this without moving
>> around a lot of data, it might be viable.
> 
> I believe I've addressed that point.

The assumption was ‘to place the fragments in order using existing efficiencies,’ which assumed the data starts at the beginning of the conventional UDP area in each fragment. That’s what LITE+FRAG does.. You need to copy to achieve that.

Joe