IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tsvwg-udp-options-05.txt

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 28 February 2017 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73015129739 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:17:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sBu9KhQC240 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E8B129736 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.81] (nib.isi.edu [128.9.160.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1SLHGgx000469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:17:16 -0800 (PST)
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <148823787288.13843.6091386736320524682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <800de1a6-cb9b-f22b-946a-8b6832fc9a05@isi.edu> <20170228163751.GA89477@cowbell.employees.org> <7d58ead9-2d1a-d35c-7cd2-90526918838c@isi.edu> <20170228204607.GA71184@cowbell.employees.org> <CALx6S36RvV0i4VSO=F5g6f4r4i2_VYmN6K1wygJZY7EsthFKEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <fed51ce6-d852-9f4d-91ff-08d69e80e2a0@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:17:16 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36RvV0i4VSO=F5g6f4r4i2_VYmN6K1wygJZY7EsthFKEA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: v1SLHGgx000469
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/DDqaul-_TfsS5r6RwCsBJiACP4Y>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tsvwg-udp-options-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:17:31 -0000

Hi, Tom,

OK - so I think you and Derek are basically arguing for an Internet
checksum to verify reassembly, rather than using a new or stronger one.

That's fine with me.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email