Re: [tsvwg] L4S status: #17 Interaction w/ FQ AQMs

Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> Mon, 16 September 2019 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <pete@heistp.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72161200F7 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heistp.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5l12z17BaqL for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095211200B8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id i18so6754345wru.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heistp.net; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=cd9kFbxf5JFncD3G3EFf17phcDfuTAO9PgBjnvCSARk=; b=JoM5I7cQPpCsUy4YnGdyi743QHb+rYUaI7PVWbegSdkDCQZ2P+muEsut+MHir0qKxc pk2Q5l+nbSxFsRIJtVH0DTAMOZkhohxRrYBgfDZXcSimsDlC2n0mguI4gXbaT32tifr8 vOmB2LkRiu6ROqOWr6hQpHXQELUijmDoRx1zPA7ADFu0I/kE+POmacmXU2Bsu4ne8uZQ gyeNC/n4qV0FGpkT9/IzQ354rOQJAM6KaFPL5sams2mc1kAeoSSNzkGk1ISGTbjfZALd gcOZNezqkfP/KlBF66PwLFj9TBJxW7qu1xLbBvu7k+TGtmvF3B7vlw+w1Br5Z05lIi2n uVjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=cd9kFbxf5JFncD3G3EFf17phcDfuTAO9PgBjnvCSARk=; b=sRO3+jL/510a0a1CpWmoLLrDNvvGGlmKqp03TAYwoE7+fu8glg3vkmos8CVMze0eOs 04CKyppdAhFdUlliKmLyGghnh+pwVoG3O6HKwt+ITdSJgFI7SEVjJgE/6piX6wnlP+rI tZbbJ3PAbE/C8u9c6kMBBEYPG3q4FEO2BkPZtBF98CcHx1uJy7RlRIvhrbRSAyLsAQAu GceXDZirSdw//Wk8reDL6UMCOOzuWsOt4qzyCYkfAGZBLERidtAthKi3P4pRvhqpW1mT tuu2YHyBEIkXvPFoyRwgJKVf0Z6CoPYuQHy7gHZ/EyfgoXFcY62cbu9mHQP49Hd4Uj3R jazA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMs6vOYESVEV31YDdsz+4iFcD0yemlqoSMwqP1oafGbiwF5lpN vuMGqEvWZVh0kOG0uNqyRNHP+9Qv07g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZVRMiXzfZ0U57UPiU2a1TgWlfma3kuh1ETyybA86WxhlKFS2BkA3Kb+mUBZVMZOs46i8BpA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:670c:: with SMTP id o12mr14202872wru.103.1568613489869; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yoda.luk.heistp.net (h-1169.lbcfree.net. [185.193.85.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1sm6181753wmb.19.2019.09.15.22.58.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A706B11-3239-4DAC-BE85-0B4BFF2D8FF8@heistp.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:58:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <85653C73-449A-4FB0-B15A-F3617B398D29@heistp.net>
References: <8321f975-dfe7-694c-b5cc-09fa371b9b61@mti-systems.com> <B58A5572-510E-42C7-8181-42A0BE298393@gmail.com> <D2E12331-F504-4D5F-B8E7-A1A5E98DDF7E@cablelabs.com> <2275E6A5-C8F8-477F-A24A-3E6168917DDF@gmail.com> <55F724CD-6E74-40D9-8416-D1918C2008DD@cablelabs.com> <BBE7C7A9-0222-4D84-BF27-8D5CAE2F995E@gmail.com> <6f189711-ffa0-90f4-fd16-3464ba4df3ce@mti-systems.com> <4A706B11-3239-4DAC-BE85-0B4BFF2D8FF8@heistp.net>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/DpV7SgBsrUblt4CcYfgEUbANcaY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] L4S status: #17 Interaction w/ FQ AQMs
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 05:58:15 -0000

> On Sep 11, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Sep 9, 2019, at 9:01 PM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Is anyone planning to perform this testing in a rough timeframe they might want to share?
> 
> Hi Wesley, I’ll share results from relevant testing in the next day or two...

Just adding to this thread that the interaction with CoDel is shown in a few different ways in the SCE-L4S “bakeoff” tests in scenarios 2, 3, 5 and 6:

https://github.com/heistp/sce-l4s-bakeoff/