IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] WG Call for comments on intended document status for draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-08, by June 23rd 2023

Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 June 2023 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38BFC151551 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QuGquyKwNBf2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A002CC14CF05 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7624679c9c4so297849385a.1 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687282384; x=1689874384; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uoRdmDAlZ8MUzYl1HZkUV/l483uOiU682zHw3rtlTxA=; b=oahpobQ4WMCl3pCtScKcoPrSetCTZSNaRPzINixAEkK/NwbIWwKOa8EcxmkuA76TxB SW6Az1CT2h0WkOr0I/ejY2AfJlnL+neTLurUUFZrDAP2lnPaAlVVU1unQTAdvqxLB9my JxVq5JcvXI3AuRUG+x0D+y9apjYjmDx1d0L7SudUUNteygoNEWffMGZpCT+s8NzBQsoI ZitSyt59NPU4xftk2vAL/sj5KeT1YbOIi9eF2e24TR08CyB3Ydh2z7E4y99b7FLkczRH vceKLApayfBAXc1VKygiyOk5b16v9dRuNm1UuTMh7aEWJxNkBcHLdcZNEu6+GIJRzILN ZOxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687282384; x=1689874384; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uoRdmDAlZ8MUzYl1HZkUV/l483uOiU682zHw3rtlTxA=; b=cnc4EWArQlw5H9hzoDouLo+hVjGK/aE8YtFsOAubGXqVZkvJb+6U3D0Afvv14i/oQv i6ZG7yRpX2F16aIxlwQ0YrEUAQw7+67r0/M86/gIT8jpthM5GnfXs5hc2mBdIjNSPAc9 ffX6kjXt6EOib/7/96BA65r5JVkHRMgWZioqmyGZINMpjhY3YFO4hVR8JA8nZloz3Vzw suMRkes4f+sBcNpY4vEEzEvCdoqRAV7XNnQGwJhuG1RKrAXAdk9GUA0HEs67s0rg1/a4 creA4Rwe7ZqWzjxeAKMX0Zp3KylYf2wNISceftjXQEj4fGbZ2BHuJGMrASfkwdRh2mW5 LyBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyoQCrJUvdYpoODeV0ee3sAlG0VOQl6NLAze1Jh4IXZV8Y1iSwJ pFkYCYODXidyEZgOh0RYQf1CLcjTxAMzsmQuiZAJhg9mOBI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4VEU4uqf3H5170l+1Kz1NHOt4crQYzlYK12wvohS8wu92kJeuw0WD0qEnZ1FELlBhjlyrMdP7idTHjEwcuy8Q=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5d62:0:b0:62d:d809:1f7 with SMTP id fn2-20020ad45d62000000b0062dd80901f7mr20139040qvb.21.1687282384428; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9cab8883-9dd9-1c59-cdfd-4a185e97c8ce@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <DU2PR02MB101606EEBC6197ECFF83A4A80885CA@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <BE1P281MB1652CA9B069FA5274ED80C16FA5CA@BE1P281MB1652.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BE1P281MB1652CA9B069FA5274ED80C16FA5CA@BE1P281MB1652.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:32:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CACJ6M17oKoGX=pn6Hvvk_4sw=n8_Tc4YDXiU8ibKBFy8SBAzRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028e05805fe930b99"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/HiBP6MyH6tXWFFiGg726Aa5wFqM>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] WG Call for comments on intended document status for draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-08, by June 23rd 2023
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:33:06 -0000

All,

It feels like MPDCCP has been in development for a long time. I'm impressed
with the amount of work that has gone into it, by Markus and others. It
retains efficiency advantages over MPQUIC, which will be advantageous in
some deployments.

The document itself looks to be in a good state, and I like the new Path
Usage Strategies wording.
https://github.com/markusa/ietf-multipath-dccp/pull/195 is an improvement.

In my view Proposed Standard is far more appropriate than Experimental. We
should go ahead.

Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email