Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00.txt

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A429B21F8D19; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.317
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-1hq+vE2Skb; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E8921F84B0; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1216; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363193452; x=1364403052; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=5sTCTQA8ypALR6Z4f3lbKKvHpfMtlmar0hJjGd+yLuM=; b=bHdRJWLc7Vo6xbsRMkM1LnvwnhGpoib+DemDXlUfgKecDkQedNif+vM2 bVryacWONBE4a+HD06mXnCI92XfQBD5UYnu+n6ry0O4NHWRXdULbhQ4AH CPWYxGNNdX4Lci55YXcPFV8vtoy1es5F34QLMRMlFa6nYV7r8exUVzfxR 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFADysQFGtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABDxH+BWRZ0gioBAQEDATo9AhACAQgiFBAyJQIEDgUIAQuHegYMwkcXjUyBDgIxB4JfYQOXdY9XgwqBczU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,838,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="187079100"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2013 16:50:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2DGoqqP015366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:50:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.206]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:50:52 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOIAqa1tJ18EAwSkCm0kPJ4goPbpikKZCA
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:50:51 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B7D045F@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <20130313164833.27324.89314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130313164833.27324.89314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.236.166]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <023025B6AC7FCE40A4FB902A9216A212@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:50:53 -0000

Folks. I posted the email I sent yesterday as a draft, for discussion. I welcome comments, and if substantive comments are made, suggested text.


On Mar 13, 2013, at 12:48 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
 wrote:

> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Fred Baker and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 IETF Recommendations Regarding Active Queue Management
> Creation date:	 2013-03-13
> Group:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 7
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-tsvwg-aqm-recommendation-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   Fifteen years after the IAB issued its recommendations regarding
>   congestion control in RFC 2309, a major issue in the community is the
>   issue that RFC addresses: Buffer bloat.  It may be time to update the
>   recommendation.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
>