RE: Deprecating ICMP Source Quench messages

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 29 November 2010 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5233A3A6BDE for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:04:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMUUB35t1Mnb for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:04:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903DF3A6B28 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:04:46 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj0DANOy80yrR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACUQYFjjGdxpxubQoVHBIRc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,277,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="385705296"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2010 22:05:56 +0000
Received: from dwingWS (dhcp-128-107-101-222.cisco.com [128.107.101.222]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oATM5uk5024853; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:05:56 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Fernando Gont'" <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "'tsvwg'" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <4CF0454A.8070008@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4CF0454A.8070008@gont.com.ar>
Subject: RE: Deprecating ICMP Source Quench messages
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:05:56 -0800
Message-ID: <0e2d01cb9011$992edc60$cb8c9520$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcuNw0U9CcEHe9RJQ2ODPg/MHb9vAgCTjhVw
Content-Language: en-us
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:04:47 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Fernando Gont
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 3:40 PM
> To: tsvwg
> Subject: Deprecating ICMP Source Quench messages
> 
> Folks,
> 
> At the tsvwg wg meeting @ Beijing I presented the I-D
> draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench-00, which aims at deprecating ICMP
> Source
> Quench messages.
> 
> My understanding is that the general feeling was "Oh, yeah... we should
> have deprecated ICMP Source Quench a long time ago" (which had also
> been
> the feeling at tcpm when we had discussed this idea years ago).
> 
> However, since nobody had actually read the I-D, the decision about
> adoption of this document as a wg item was deferred.
> 
> So I'm asking for feedback on the document, and on whether there's
> support to pursue this document in tsvwg.
> 
> FWIW, the document is so short that, even if you have not read it
> before, it shouldn't take more than a few minutes to skim through it.

I read it.  Looks good.  

Might also want to mention that ICMPv6 didn't bother defining 
Source Quench.

-d