Re: Deprecating ICMP Source Quench messages

[Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>]

+1.

On 11/29/2010 2:05 PM, Dan Wing (dwing) wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
> > Of Fernando Gont
> > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 3:40 PM
> > To: tsvwg
> > Subject: Deprecating ICMP Source Quench messages
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > At the tsvwg wg meeting @ Beijing I presented the I-D
> > draft-gont-tsvwg-source-quench-00, which aims at deprecating ICMP
> > Source
> > Quench messages.
> >
> > My understanding is that the general feeling was "Oh, yeah... we should
> > have deprecated ICMP Source Quench a long time ago" (which had also
> > been
> > the feeling at tcpm when we had discussed this idea years ago).
> >
> > However, since nobody had actually read the I-D, the decision about
> > adoption of this document as a wg item was deferred.
> >
> > So I'm asking for feedback on the document, and on whether there's
> > support to pursue this document in tsvwg.
> >
> > FWIW, the document is so short that, even if you have not read it
> > before, it shouldn't take more than a few minutes to skim through it.
>
> I read it.  Looks good.
>
> Might also want to mention that ICMPv6 didn't bother defining
> Source Quench.
>
> -d
>
>

-- 

*Mahesh Jethanandani*
*Technical Leader*
**ERBU*
*
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Phone :*[phone]*
Fax :*[phone]*

	

**
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95070
United States
www.cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com>

	

This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the 
sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or 
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.