Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey
Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Tue, 23 February 2021 08:45 UTC
Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B5F3A28A4 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:45:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.57, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJlJV-fHm-D5 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr150054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.15.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7043A2888 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:45:37 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EVayjfESJm4WOq6+PGCwP9swG3k4xLSf1dvriX/4WKDras/GiLhhI/IzeF6DaMRSlKctWsWvIzzVokFm6AlcPuXhqkE3tpVkuTUZJWnHbxOTvzNjoNg/3umopvHgkRTi6lLNBmuXa9s3Nxq6Mnx2UUHaES/mTilCznWVFM+1xEh1Fk17RcV030EiREZBtPZcdHOMj4Dh+OadHlBbVOqlSTMCaOFYfdTe9hYs3QW2y+WHfEtWxNLSNZDsppW/HLmB0iEmVbrNjBGQYAuM/Apcq3cZ+GBN4T0QwwZe8Pb8yYai4XrgGtKuQ/i7YBo0Fdd7Zxb4IvW2T5nOp22xI4OK/A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JzJpql8iN2lyzk4VyewGz0g04uPO6JymDHI2SEB+CsY=; b=WHE1oFXib3l0kdZKbFJxnfDSc1vOXdLd2sP7gmfWtEKHFRRIPt0s5prB3TEPizeh2Kq+S7w6GBtiY9/7kw+xLumEjzX7OSrCW858Is9KdFRKmBQfpEi72Q8JitZOjKFg9uxKrwnXuyZkpvpcpCv+Rh1VYudgYeaYLd4x3qTLx0EOyl8OvqTzzgRvAY/NuicdGVjs/483AmjhEYYFBfa0Fv1bI1WRK2mi6QaSpVV2A2gVDg4PkEGgKE4IUWMK5hOlHnwFgvqfulpYPmKUZP/Nr3xtMsPMzBEniFlMaBWtYc+HV+/4ext4cGbniksr4NRmcnPnRxlkAl7gWTDlB20A9w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JzJpql8iN2lyzk4VyewGz0g04uPO6JymDHI2SEB+CsY=; b=giKP7JQBWbEHxOljJ5ig8pVKi2MmK9bNjCaxrzrMJlWn10Z9zlFKfXcKKZGV1SPwRyl+ESbvRNd0hOfT+/O9eJr6OkyGfL2jrVkoySJt7YhXMZSHeSwvly+dl7PgVdoZv8tmpqGTIQg93k4P4R7q3sXOnCB3UC/HhvGbDAnkbT0=
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:6c::8) by HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:6c::8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3890.8; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:45:32 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::494d:6160:61fd:5b1]) by HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::494d:6160:61fd:5b1%9]) with mapi id 15.20.3890.018; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:45:32 +0000
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net>, "De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey
Thread-Index: AdbzPLYWoHtOCowHQ0uox2aN7ECzHgE/jRFAASKPXuAATuD/IAAGkG8AAFuTK9ACdEFagAAZQAQw
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:45:32 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0701MB229930BB8F058B2D874C7FA3C2809@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM8PR07MB7476A907FDD0A49ADBD7CA7EB9BD0@AM8PR07MB7476.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SN2PR00MB017475FC0E8C13754E531E17B6B69@SN2PR00MB0174.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <AM8PR07MB7476FAE559719D241375A816B9B19@AM8PR07MB7476.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <HE1PR0701MB22999C8C05ECA3D995FA7FFEC28F9@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM8PR07MB7476E0EB3FC368D3C69A5466B98F9@AM8PR07MB7476.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <HE1PR0701MB229971850F775AD5DD1855FDC28D9@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <f4b73d65-1449-426b-c8f8-5540f047dd49@bobbriscoe.net>
In-Reply-To: <f4b73d65-1449-426b-c8f8-5540f047dd49@bobbriscoe.net>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: bobbriscoe.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;bobbriscoe.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [83.227.122.88]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 383b2d02-d10e-4ff6-c9c5-08d8d7d7618f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR0701MB2299:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0701MB229950CD14A10FE0386C9613C2809@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:3383;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: UVKKvbwyXq5YWLWmAWq9jl/ixBRu+E9rRM+Ap6NAgxHfq6F9XzQCWoJvqXPqoUSE8cK8S+RCIFPQ3a/L7sMJ4GgIkj6q9Cb4weuJ8VSfdpvcrM21ACYT9HgUshYRA6rih/AgSuSv7osghpP1AlmFdbttvLHDz/VICd3LN8GH4s5c1T+pQtWavVrgUznDaod9L4w70ekYHb+GsBYwkREi3PahxmsZznF68td9ReT0xb//1RE1jXFsBB1fcgcE1sK8LjKXbBSq19RiNCccf5ll5Kt/ys2kaxVLAnvFz/6OJcBRVXjNJhXJO58T/GhcfnbkN/3ForZJ3Bjr6+eUMQYAwFb8gVZP2ecIImJ1oVS/RvtjKN/MVjyOq2cXiRzEsCyNtVsYmxAgbst8A9oOdsGBaf5fIWr/Q3+AgcDs9GVKxL1nh88dbnaTqh0CX/tFlkSLe5wKqBd/2EKWhCwlLZCIqvUIV2vwLwQWILoSJW7SVma4XAUsHa4weg2nMTYd5p5ZXufSAa2DlHGOxZGM/7zGzNOBGNUVY5rOkutaPjU/7FdnLbeFdS0bx7VrGJWEXoBmbU3aNTNUzRDXqYVdhikV7+SsdhalSgQjKZ/h9JUqDV0oHKiLQX35+wkjXbm5G4nfrtPW92qurfPdXQi4pl+r5ChFqD5fKDALhPIlyuH8UXNpjoGFDj3MPzhyvxa+y3yx
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(136003)(2906002)(110136005)(186003)(52536014)(86362001)(26005)(71200400001)(107886003)(316002)(6506007)(9686003)(53546011)(55016002)(66616009)(66556008)(64756008)(66946007)(33656002)(7696005)(5660300002)(478600001)(66446008)(8936002)(4326008)(966005)(76116006)(99936003)(8676002)(83380400001)(66476007)(336755003)(18886065003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0068_01D709C8.9FFC9A00"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 383b2d02-d10e-4ff6-c9c5-08d8d7d7618f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Feb 2021 08:45:32.6079 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yJiFzIamL+nX2k2wORp87VI1UJX1EkEccfLeCCTlh4Dqz7qxVvf+t6MuT2v870WM22hYtY64oOppRpKIIwMP2TUXRkkDWepd2BksTDy/45Rf+1KoD8FLEyL2s+p3S4GF
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0701MB2299
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/sGENDmy6YsYZGkZjNb3QY8nyrfo>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:45:43 -0000
Hi Bob Please see inline [IJ2] From: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net> Sent: den 22 februari 2021 21:35 To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>; De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>; tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar, On 10/02/2021 09:09, Ingemar Johansson S wrote: Hi Please see inline /Ingemar From: De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <mailto:koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com> <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com> Sent: den 8 februari 2021 14:37 To: Ingemar Johansson S <mailto:ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>; tsvwg IETF list <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org> <tsvwg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: Prague requirements survey Hi Ingemar, Thanks for your contributions. I linked your doc to the https://l4steam.github.io/#prague-requirements-compliance <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ae271499-f1bc2db2-ae275402-866038973a 15-a6d18987ee63d9e2&q=1&e=4b98878d-2d51-48b6-9518-92696e72501d&u=https%3A%2F %2Fl4steam.github.io%2F%23prague-requirements-compliance> web page (and will do so for others). [IJ] OK, great! I didn't see any issues or objections mentioned to the current requirements as specified in the draft. Does this mean you think they are all reasonable, valid and feasible? [IJ] There is a slight possibility that I misunderstood parts of the layout. Even though SCReAM is only partially compliant in many cases I believe that requirements are reasonable. Interesting observation (related to the performance optimization topic 1) that for the control packets "RTCP is likely not using ECT(1)". Why is this not likely? I assume this will impact the performance? Do we need to recommend the use of ECT(1) on RTCP packets in the draft? [IJ] Upon first glance I don't see that it is beneficial that RTCP packets are ECT(1). But of course there is a possibility that RTCP packets go into a queue with higher latency and that may affect performance. So. perhaps it is reasonable that RTCP packets are ECT(1) too, but these are then to be regarded as non queue building as it can be hard to rate control RTCP. [BB] My knowledge is outdated, but RTCP used to be rate controlled in multicast to prevent implosion (that was in the early days on shared multicast, not single source). Are you saying all rate control mechanisms have been removed? Is the problem that there's no feedback channel for congestion indications on feedback? In 2-way RTP at least, couldn't you infer the congestion of RTCP datagrams from the ECN on data running alongside it? Or might they be disjoint paths? [IJ2] Yes. It would of course be possible to set ECT(1) on RTCP/UDP/IP packets and determine how large share of these packets that are marked. The problem is then that there is not (currently) any RTCP feedback(on feedback) format to carry that information back to the RTCP sender (==streaming client) to make some rate control of the RTCP feedback possible. The RTCP bandwidth is indeed limited, the rule of thumb is that it should be less than 5% of the RTP media bitrate scaled down by the number of receivers. SCReAM is just one receiver and the RTCP bitrate is roughly 2% of the medial bitrate. Incidentally, the attitude being taken to ECT on TCP Pure ACKs in AccECN is in the AccECN draft. Basically, the info is now there for Ack CC if needed, but no need to use it currently. Bob Thanks, Koen. From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com <mailto:ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 10:59 AM To: De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com <mailto:koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com> >; tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org> > Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com <mailto:ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> > Subject: RE: Prague requirements survey Hi Please find attached (hopefully) a Prague requirements survey applied to SCReAM (RFC8298 std + running code) Regards Ingemar From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) Sent: den 6 februari 2021 23:20 To: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org> > Subject: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Hi all, To get a better understanding on the level of consensus on the Prague requirements, we prepared an overview document listing the L4S-ID draft requirements specific to the CC (wider Prague requirements), as a questionnaire towards potential CC developers. If you are developing or have developed an L4S congestion control, you can describe the status of your ongoing development in the second last column. If you cannot share status, or plan-to/would implement an L4S CC, you can list what you would want to support (see feasible). In the last column you can put any description/limitations/remarks/explanations related to evaluations, implementations and/or plans (will implement or will not implement). Any expected or experienced issues and any objections/disagreements to the requirement can be explained and colored appropriately. The document can be found on following link: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/L4STeam/l4steam.github.io/master/PragueReq s/Prague_requirements_Compliance_and_Objections_template.docx <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=d16bc960-8ef0f066-d16b89fb-86ee86bd51 07-080c65bfd839440d&q=1&e=7dbb7494-67c3-4315-88a6-325f32e4e8b1&u=https%3A%2F %2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2FL4STeam%2Fl4steam.github.io%2Fmaster%2FPrague Reqs%2FPrague_requirements_Compliance_and_Objections_template.docx> As an example I filled it for the Linux TCP-Prague implementation on following link: https://l4steam.github.io/PragueReqs/Prague_requirements_Compliance_and_Obje ctions_Linux_TCP-Prague.docx <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f839c5f7-a7a2fcf1-f839856c-86ee86bd51 07-29dabadc5d0e673d&q=1&e=7dbb7494-67c3-4315-88a6-325f32e4e8b1&u=https%3A%2F %2Fl4steam.github.io%2FPragueReqs%2FPrague_requirements_Compliance_and_Objec tions_Linux_TCP-Prague.docx> Please send your filled document to the list (Not sure if an attachment will work, so I assume you also need to store it somewhere and send a link to it, or send to me directly). We hope to collect many answers, understanding the position of the different (potential) implementers and come faster to consensus. Thanks, Koen. -- ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/ <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=9e93ec25-c108d525-9e93acbe-86fc6812c3 61-6ce26fbc5b7d3fe4&q=1&e=9dde995b-c278-4be1-a612-c70ef0067fc2&u=http%3A%2F% 2Fbobbriscoe.net%2F>
- [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Vidhi Goel
- Re: [tsvwg] Prague requirements survey Bob Briscoe