IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4583)

<lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Tue, 05 April 2016 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D87012D113 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pt64dTJPDf8V for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.120.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699C412D124 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1459815587; bh=LSp2ZIDzvLkOqu1CrFGcPGqwT8GS5v3drFSnngOZ+PM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=H3KkG28nJ3oFVg13jc+MwWvoMTz/ygRmZspccyRrvEHM7Mt2s9TnCw1vsFhy+cRoNEWVb7KwI3GDk6Po22/IMJ1WLIRD/5t2N/Ddv5ewLRbDyygssHRl6M5Z/BSio1M3PMDLvH4CRPBltVJgrUWmiWpBGvohSkZnjiwo4cv3mcCBKORRwtRPV5cQgVN9KgSvtOM+w5q7Yfn0H/JP4rM1vqPr4TUjJgwzHrxyNxFNs46O1Z0OhvBqKAXkHCkwGrU2/jKX66u1nU68VFYlexvuyXLn1mS2fsOPmOfDypyskbuPejGgFmpM5oMXtD5VCEqKfaNvSaRIa+SsNS+tp15y2Q==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2016 00:19:47 -0000
Received: from [98.138.226.177] by nm48.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2016 00:16:46 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.58] by tm12.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2016 00:16:46 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.70] by tm11.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2016 00:16:46 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1007.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2016 00:16:46 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 745606.80653.bm@omp1007.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: 5yiVQ7gVM1kmzehSjB2oJY2ny5csu508ReB4menI.tXmJV47JV4LsNiSqgRxunL ZN1n4V790rw_EvkIVmdYaYLo_FVRE5bi6Ltn9Tykh.7nA5IjcCyYzDJD5.NhPVSSVAKhwjkrlb5m zStZbxQbyVEwCmaZ2RqYztbZBw2_3iSMufLSMbsKUuqeDROqGeoF0VXHqU9PjBPZCMXXqYFye.wS aa3373R0HcwPEVFkmiOM1A_1Hjp0BCXoUN7m28LEyWqz4BkbMdUOXLQSfu0uLjWmk_m7KrCpZRHx jSe0kpIwwiaRowP5zkJYo0BNggHT.oCsdIhWvlT6vio..unQP07IrlO.61TL_DbDJXa8CYLG6Rse puKxAEyY44o8nWO577auBtdivKbq9jHxwNE1ct6ly95eeIwIkuG1ttQLCABchrthJqRO9polE461 JvFOBLEU.ll0qm4JwDffFNewWpGOPlA2w81sf65r82J8F4_OuPTJFVgaDr1xjmmgLEP3rBcYMOrl FkRZ8DEn8QqYXsPTCcis72CPauS_reR71mKzE
Received: by 217.12.9.11; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:16:46 +0000
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:16:30 +0000
From: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "touch@isi.edu" <touch@isi.edu>, "mallman@bbn.com" <mallman@bbn.com>, "floyd@icir.org" <floyd@icir.org>, "craig@bbn.com" <craig@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <2057219261.4590383.1459815390909.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160403132134.0B8B9180014@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160403132134.0B8B9180014@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/kYfLzj76dwHNJcbKHM6jtLrtlRA>
Cc: "mls.ietf@gmail.com" <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4583)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:19:51 -0000

"a TCP MAY start"

a TCP what? session? flow? transaction? tunnel? DoS attack?

thanks

L.

 Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk http://about.me/lloydwood 


----- Original Message -----
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: touch@isi.edu; mallman@bbn.com; floyd@icir.org; craig@bbn.com
Cc: mls.ietf@gmail.com; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; iesg@ietf.org; tsvwg@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, 3 April 2016, 23:21
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4583)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC3390,
"Increasing TCP's Initial Window". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4583

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Date Reported: 2016-01-06
Verified by: Martin Stiemerling (IESG)

Section: 1.

Original Text
-------------
   This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a
   larger initial window.  However, we expect that most general-purpose
   TCP implementations would choose to use the larger initial congestion
   window given in equation (1) above.

Corrected Text
--------------
   This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a
   smaller initial window.  However, we expect that most general-purpose
   TCP implementations would choose to use the larger initial congestion
   window given in equation (1) above.

Notes
-----
The MAY allows use of values smaller than this document allows, not larger.

--------------------------------------
RFC3390 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-initwin-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Increasing TCP's Initial Window
Publication Date    : October 2002
Author(s)           : M. Allman, S. Floyd, C. Partridge
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email