IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4583)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 03 April 2016 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D060B12D110; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tq_yoIQJcRk6; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D31412D10D; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0B8B9180014; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: touch@isi.edu, mallman@bbn.com, floyd@icir.org, craig@bbn.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160403132134.0B8B9180014@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 06:21:34 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/vpuhJFvtF-vmkcHpSgQVVr6APM8>
Cc: mls.ietf@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4583)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 13:22:18 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC3390,
"Increasing TCP's Initial Window". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4583

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Date Reported: 2016-01-06
Verified by: Martin Stiemerling (IESG)

Section: 1.

Original Text
-------------
   This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a
   larger initial window.  However, we expect that most general-purpose
   TCP implementations would choose to use the larger initial congestion
   window given in equation (1) above.

Corrected Text
--------------
   This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a
   smaller initial window.  However, we expect that most general-purpose
   TCP implementations would choose to use the larger initial congestion
   window given in equation (1) above.

Notes
-----
The MAY allows use of values smaller than this document allows, not larger.

--------------------------------------
RFC3390 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-initwin-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Increasing TCP's Initial Window
Publication Date    : October 2002
Author(s)           : M. Allman, S. Floyd, C. Partridge
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email