IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-32

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 04 April 2024 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C924AC169437; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.315
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bCV5rJgYyReI; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09334C151084; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KsdaBf8xSSQKSQMmh+jo4LGCWbpZUOIE1HXeIbysgXo=; b=YkTPqM8djea/ZXvpDlom/xDopG vqaaHHFL6856UsMNCzn9WQlpsxZ09cVN23IIdYTDl6g0eZuy6JxtIuYih2+nIPeEU+sgubM7tyfH9 BVpY/fFxZ1e+PZFPQi6ODAUmuMZxzT+EEAamimnozGcR4H1EGzheoYIvPBKmsGu9+d7niD/G7xJI1 hF5AGFGKqgNbE+XaD4+4BNUdDFOt2v69N+sLCr7spg1axR6dX3NtP81rTwFdMdDxvo36bPNCkMMaQ Juj217F0m5CL8v3Kpsd/7S7UTZTAuH/tfABLBq7x7W9AIOMNNz3xiIvV0s4AITpG+rJTG3/HBwJBJ 2/yWUSww==;
Received: from [172.58.208.48] (port=45906 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1rsUis-004Do2-26; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:34:19 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F41D9BF9-6D72-42B3-9DF4-FC421CD40B14"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VGOLkJU1m7pqSXRRouCKwdQ6yrbmaPwoa22Jr-N3FZNzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:34:02 -0700
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options.all@ietf.org
Message-Id: <DF6188E5-9323-47A4-B359-6C6CA8ECD7A8@strayalpha.com>
References: <CAM4esxSpwRF5E3Xc_hotgvCSdKVe4BY_zRUKAzHvW48JEtWqTA@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VGOLkJU1m7pqSXRRouCKwdQ6yrbmaPwoa22Jr-N3FZNzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/p1SNYwflRF_LSEuerOBtj_0fG4A>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-32
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 21:34:25 -0000

Hi, all,

Thanks Martin for the detailed review. I’m hoping we can split it out so the thread of each piece can be tracked in Github, so I’ll wait for that before responding further.

On the point below, can you (both) help me understand the error you see?

It is intended to be clarified as:

	"NOPs are not reported to the user, [regardless of] whether [they are] used [i.e., part of the options that appear] per-datagram or per-fragment ([the latter] as defined in Section 11.4).”

Joe

> On Apr 4, 2024, at 2:22 PM, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote: 
>> (11.6) "NOPs are not reported to the user, whether used per-datagram or per-fragment (as defined in Section 11.4)."
>> 
>> I think this is a cut-and-paste error.
> 
> Agreed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email