IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] A New Draft Uploaded (draft-qiang-tsvwg-udp-options-bounded-latency-00)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10D6130E83 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1KnMjIomSyi0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A44130DCB for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=G67N+8GNysCM1Id6OQyoeQY7SN7lznHK0PsnZraTzAU=; b=BK8yl517vk3UUAq116x8+XLnOq z0qf65waurlEJhq+Wys3Zq4/5wyRan67sQ6d3Z7RcTrGofZgy16fmy5UghGh7C6v8yn/VY9H8N17e g1gVcsW6hWPKbJLNm/DAD6vOWzS26ckNhXjpxqVwnmhxBfbZGjC0RO9TkgXeCjhkQk2d/I0HOEMEj m9Fdet5urwZWLhyMcoLdrH0afRcbhIgVA5LxAWojziVb9vPQtBD2GkjoYwSET3xSdpHFt6ogZWehQ SCpO1yzePrMJrNPRLn4omioXJWOQJVsv1oc8vAvzzIiXERk+snRJWwswPB7OYq9raTXDez1/btjho 6LMnQYeA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:62981 helo=[192.168.1.250]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1h3Bbs-0027SC-Oc; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:28:17 -0400
To: "qiangli (D)" <qiangli3@huawei.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED45BE93CB@dggemi529-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CALx6S37Ba9c45cwZbqfsaA=geQGW0FK9NohZTRZe2_pMbK2pWA@mail.gmail.com> <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED45BF5F52@dggemi529-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Message-ID: <b84873dc-29b5-2acd-36cc-fb5a65f7da5d@strayalpha.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:28:15 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED45BF5F52@dggemi529-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/qJBYRA1LGTCQ-CV1TSKBFJIrdi8>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] A New Draft Uploaded (draft-qiang-tsvwg-udp-options-bounded-latency-00)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 03:28:28 -0000

On 3/10/2019 6:18 PM, qiangli (D) wrote:
> we also value UDP option as a potential way for end-user to express their requirement directly to network,

This seems misguided to me. Transport headers and options are intended
for endpoints; if you need to express information to the network, it
should be in the network headers.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email