Re: [tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-08 - To conclude 19th November, 2014

[Bob Braden <[e-mail]>]

On 11/25/2014 11:53 AM, Becke, Martin wrote:
>
> - “Heartbeats SHOULD be sent to PF destination(s) once per RTO. This means the sender MUST ignore HB.interval for PF destinations.”
>   
How about: "Heartbeats are sent to PF destination(s) once per RTO" ?  
There is no need to shout... ;-)

Bob Braden




> This sounds strange to me. Why is SHOULD used here and what are the alternatives, when I MUST ignore HB.interval for PF destinations. I guess a rephrase of this two lines can help.
>
> - A link is missing in Section 5.1: [RFC6458] defines the constants SCTP_ADDR_AVAILABLE,….
>
> Best
> ________________________________________
> Von: tsvwg [[e-mail]]" im Auftrag von "[e-mail] [[e-mail]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2014 15:01
> An: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Betreff: [tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-08 - To conclude 19th November, 2014
>
> TSVWG,
>
> This is the start of a WGLC on "Quick Failover Algorithm in SCTP".
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-08
>
> This WGLC will last until Wednesday, 19th November, 2014, this includes
> the period of the coming IETF meeting.
>
> A good note to the list is "I have read this version of the draft,
> and I approve (or support) its progression to RFC". The chairs
> request notes to the list showing support to get a sense of the WG.
>
> Of course, you can ask for alternate text (where you supply the
> actual replacement text, or convey the meaning sufficiently to the
> authors) for anywhere in the document that you find unclear or troublesome.
>
> James/Gorry/David
> TSVWG chairs
>
>


-- 
Robert Braden
Internet and Networked Systems Division
USC Information Sciences Institute
310.448.9173