Re: [Txauth] WG name brainstorming - please participate!

Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Sat, 02 May 2020 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438A83A12CA for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 May 2020 07:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZd0g9_7j6i2 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 May 2020 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1888E3A12C9 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 May 2020 07:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (static-71-174-62-56.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.62.56]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 042EPfqj012168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 2 May 2020 10:25:42 -0400
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <D28BD01A-8895-4EB5-9ECA-FDAF87FA89BE@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_977F7D8B-83B2-4CE9-9453-F2740FD2B23C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 10:25:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-skQf0UtZJ65+oEXKxhPb7Xarhp=h22jocypo52mef7_w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
References: <CAD9ie-skQf0UtZJ65+oEXKxhPb7Xarhp=h22jocypo52mef7_w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/lax9p5ED75k4HCV1LwqeFO1W-fc>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] WG name brainstorming - please participate!
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 14:25:47 -0000

Dick,

Thanks for kicking this off. I’m going to submit that we keep the current name of the mailing list:

TxAuth

 - Either “Transactional Authn” or “The neXt Authn” or any number of other things. Or just “TxAuth” without an expansion, like the “O” in OAuth today doesn’t officially expand into anything (it’s officially the Web Authorization Protocol Framework, not “Open Authorization” as it might have been at one point). Considering the only push against TxAuth that I’ve heard is that some people don’t like “transactional” in the name, I think that’s easy enough to work around.

Not only does it have <1M hits on google, most of them point to this working group or writings about this working group. It’s a brand we already own and control, and we are the ones who can decide what it means.




Are we providing feedback inline for other proposals while we’re at it? Because “XAuth” fails the first required parameter below pretty badly:

https://www.x.org/archive/X11R6.8.1/doc/xauth.1.html <https://www.x.org/archive/X11R6.8.1/doc/xauth.1.html>


 — Justin

> On May 1, 2020, at 5:08 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We now have our criteria for names, and we can now start the next step in our process, brainstorming names!
> 
> Here is the criteria again:
> 
> Required:
> No confusion with another protocol, major software project, or IETF/IRTF WG name
> no existing registered trademarks in related classes
> Less than 1M results in Google
> Descriptive of protocol (this criteria is subjective)
> Not an offensive meaning to a member of the mail list
> Desirable:
> Straightforward to pronounce
> Easy to spell
> Easy to read
> Shortish
> We won't be judging or ranking names at this time -- we are brainstorming names that are descriptive of the protocol.
> We are hoping we can get the WG approved in the telechat May 21, 
> so ideally we would have rough consensus on the name by May 18.
> 
> Let's brainstorm for a week, and then we can stack rank them on our objective criteria, and then vote on the top candidates.
> 
> I'll start by submitting my favorite:
> 
> XAuth - Extensible delegated Authorization and Authentication protocol, or just view the X as a placeholder and XAuth is OAuth ++
> 
> -- 
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth