Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref-03

Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 04:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BD01ACE08 for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E249nldBulUz for <tzdist@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5752A1ACDB2 for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkfh127 with SMTP id h127so94600662qkf.1 for <tzdist@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LMMvEXmXQ8j294Q/TmwjmjqBbiwMb/3rQx1pnrN0Y0g=; b=JL9kkAcGN9nr5Qpjb8ibC71Mdu0dP8+hTrgJV3Dtwm2ih4TKdKvfNKMQYOS6OfjgU2 86vu6i74W/piBtU5y3/1+4C6KDwgdJ2PJKnGIU1oYeyTeJZwjsRq6dsImBJtDV/6PVu5 fl67PZu2SzOMX5nKKo1GuSPW+mgJlt89DPfn9n+vfqTfPGSB+6dXP4570X0DlKxjEPCA MJicYdo1smd9dK6Jxc31I4kw2A+ktX6b4fWLm50GKj05uYoQd2sO7W8z8zYDr2hPLa/S GWEmVFLmNGnibzA6SC0q+4+xHtXBirejPrGAGMmbszZ55K0rfOf5g2k5e3y53NOIB8SM kLHw==
X-Received: by 10.55.52.12 with SMTP id b12mr62603442qka.21.1440477870676; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.116] (cpe-67-246-36-122.nycap.res.rr.com. [67.246.36.122]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f201sm7016407qhe.26.2015.08.24.21.44.30 for <tzdist@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55DBF2AD.6070606@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:44:29 -0400
From: Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tzdist@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJKAephrJS=XHfMSM3C3qpH4_Monn+Ear1vhCjMtqVZ+4w@mail.gmail.com> <4733A6EDE125B3121612FE24@caldav.corp.apple.com> <55DB9A29.8020408@andrew.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <55DB9A29.8020408@andrew.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist/TSMm42kt1EbmghHwj7SEEFyvT2E>
Subject: Re: [Tzdist] AD review of draft-ietf-tzdist-caldav-timezone-ref-03
X-BeenThere: tzdist@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <tzdist.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tzdist/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist>, <mailto:tzdist-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 04:44:32 -0000

This is fine with me

On 8/24/15 18:26, Ken Murchison wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 05:26 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>>
>> Since there was push back along the same lines by the Prefer 
>> designated expert I would like to propose removing use of the Prefer 
>> header and instead replace it with a new HTTP request header:
>>
>> CalDAV-Timezones: Y
>> CalDAV-Timezones: N
>>
>> With the "Y" value requesting the server to send VTZ data, and "N" 
>> requesting that no VTZ data is sent.
>>
>> If there is agreement that this addresses the problem of using 
>> Prefer, then I will go ahead and make this change in the next 
>> document update.
>>
>
>
> I'm fine with using a new header as proposed.
>