Re: [Unwanted-trackers] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on charter-ietf-dult-00-04: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the update Roman. I understand it better now.

//Zahed

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:32 PM Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Zahed,
>
> Following up.  I read the reviews in reverse chronological order and found
> a common theme in the charter feedback on deliverable confusion like you
> identified.  I've published a -05 to refine the mapping between the program
> of work items and the milestones.
>
> Roman
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: iesg <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 7:43 AM
> > To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>; The IESG
> > <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: RE: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on
> charter-ietf-dult-00-04:
> > (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless
> you
> > recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> > Hi Zahed!
> >
> > Thanks for the review.  More below.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: iesg <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Zaheduzzaman Sarker
> > > via Datatracker
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 4:17 AM
> > > To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> > > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > Subject: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on
> > > charter-ietf-dult-00-04: (with
> > > COMMENT)
> > >
> > > Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments
> > > unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> > >
> > >
> > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> > > charter-ietf-dult-00-04: No Objection
> > >
> > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dult/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > COMMENT:
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > One question, does all the three program of work to publish standard
> > > track specifications covered by one standard track milestone as
> > > specified now? May be we should put more clarity in the milestones to
> > > reflect the desired program of work.
> >
> > Mirja asked a similar question during the charter consensus check.  See
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-
> > trackers/X4kAmZL9h76OhPd0-nXFsg2mKrc/.  In summary, the milestones as
> > documented currently envision that that (1) - (4) would end up in the
> same
> > document.
> >
> > Roman
>
>