Re: [urn] listed authors

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 04 July 2012 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBD721F8627 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.251, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jMrt00+NYguL for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7821F8623 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q640ctYd020272 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:38:55 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 66eb_3e04_a2c551aa_c570_11e1_9ed0_001d096c566a; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:38:54 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:33700) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S15DC051> for <urn@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:38:59 +0900
Message-ID: <4FF3909B.7040304@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:38:51 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4FF34B61.4050903@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4FF34B61.4050903@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] listed authors
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:38:53 -0000

I agree.    Regards,   Martin.

On 2012/07/04 4:43, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I have mentioned this in the past, and I'll mention it again: I think
> the new bis specs need to include the authors of the original documents,
> with the new authors shown as editors. So, for instance,
> draft-ietf-urnbis-2141bis would have the following in the header:
>
> A. Hoenes, Ed.
> R. Moats
>
> Simply ripping the old authors out of the specs is disrespectful.
>
> Peter
>