IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Control message propagation (was: draft-allbery-usefor-usepro-00 errata)

Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com> Wed, 03 January 2007 13:23 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H265o-0007zM-9t for usefor-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:23:44 -0500
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H265l-0003nx-Vc for usefor-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:23:44 -0500
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l03DKKkw000739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:20:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l03DKK9N000737; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:20:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l03DKIph000717 for <ietf-usefor@imc.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:20:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from richard@highwayman.com)
Received: from gti.noc.demon.net ([195.11.55.101] helo=happyday.al.cl.cam.ac.uk) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1H262T-0000uR-9W for ietf-usefor@imc.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:20:17 +0000
Message-ID: <FebSBpFYj5mFFAfl@highwayman.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:51:52 +0000
To: ietf-usefor@imc.org
From: Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com>
Subject: Re: Control message propagation (was: draft-allbery-usefor-usepro-00 errata)
References: <87fybia0bw.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <87odpmil35.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <87odpmil35.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.03 M <zZ$$+z3$77$$tPKL26Y+dershQ>
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <87odpmil35.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>, Russ Allbery
<rra@stanford.edu> writes

>the following under cancel control messages:
>
>   A cancel control message SHOULD have the same Newsgroups header field
>   as the message it is cancelling so that it will attempt to reach the
>   same news servers as the original message.

I don't think messages attempt anything :)

   A cancel control message SHOULD have the same Newsgroups header field
   as the message it is cancelling so as to best ensure that it will
   be relayed to the same news servers as the original message.

though if you dislike split infinitives then yet another phrase will be
necessary :)

- -- 
richard @ highwayman . com                       "Nothing seems the same
                          Still you never see the change from day to day
                                And no-one notices the customs slip away"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBRZuY2JoAxkTY1oPiEQJeVgCg1hROWcqD3NBi6L8Nvg5ySbBXI5IAn3v+
wkt9UvMu3OlLCxk4mvvDdVD1
=kKBH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email