IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 08 May 2018 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B06712EA74; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2tZQIALCEfz6; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D204126E64; Tue, 8 May 2018 10:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.200.0.109] (unknown [8.2.105.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D12ED7A3309; Tue, 8 May 2018 17:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ietf-dane@dukhovni.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <de83cc17-d23e-6096-34a9-13b79ca14c8e@sunet.se>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 13:00:21 -0400
Cc: uta@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts@ietf.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <93B66C52-0D8E-4BB9-AC08-F72153BB329A@dukhovni.org>
References: <152539648489.11713.7895583526344282774.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANtKdUeK_HpOYsP-CfhF7m7-DYiSX39xTMLxqZw-1UQsn29xyQ@mail.gmail.com> <78C81C6B-1C5F-4361-A3B7-40D9012E406A@dukhovni.org> <CA+S86mWSNwzG0_y_d=yg8Nqf9gxFud+8TAYWHY3Uw6aqn_JKog@mail.gmail.com> <C5B103C6-4A18-4013-95DB-70C2C180871C@dukhovni.org> <969F2F35-BA59-403B-81EE-44AF57FA6BB0@dukhovni.org> <CA+S86mVYXJceY-0ZGMFPHOTgzaad81EupDxjW6iMOrScSJRidQ@mail.gmail.com> <EB9C58FD-A34A-4BBE-A8B7-AF3E08E72A1C@dukhovni.org> <CANtKdUewXg7uT4DJOHbA47r8JbnPuz6H1HvZ84pUjZ1NQiSG3w@mail.gmail.com> <EB7D75E8-2B22-446A-9E1C-381AAAE1E3C7@dukhovni.org> <e5830fc8-74be-0643-badf-c2f8b106fcbe@sunet.se> <30749BB1-969B-48AD-BB24-E320DB2BFE0D@dukhovni.org> <de83cc17-d23e-6096-34a9-13b79ca14c8e@sunet.se>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/dY0u_mX1A_kxRvdgUAP83MbH4h4>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 17:00:25 -0000


> On May 8, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote:
> 
>> For the record, I agree that the specification *could* be changed along
>> the lines discussed.  I am not actively advocating for the change.
> 
> but you're not violently opposed either?

Not violently opposed, provided the text makes the MX RRset processing
obligations on the sender sufficiently clear.  As already noted, a bit
more care is required to not make certain mistakes.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email