IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4tov6transition] troubling survey

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 18 September 2010 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FED3A68F1 for <v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqOjDjkVM-fD for <v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9013A67A4 for <v4tov6transition@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id BB42A9C; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B930C9A; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:07:50 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C079BC69-8632-4A33-81A2-8C3A75AF4BE8@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1009180702410.28005@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <4C927ED5.1080406@sri.com> <C079BC69-8632-4A33-81A2-8C3A75AF4BE8@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] troubling survey
X-BeenThere: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <v4tov6transition.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition>
List-Post: <mailto:v4tov6transition@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 05:07:45 -0000

On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Fred Baker wrote:

> ankles. I suspect that as these stories become more common, we're going 
> to suddenly find people wanting to deploy "right now", and and angry if 
> everything doesn't work just perfectly out of the box.

The "right now" has been seen popping up quite a few times already from 
ISPs coming into the IETF when they started doing research and found 
things lacking for some reason or another.

Due to this, I'd say the past 1-2 years things are improving, but I 
totally agree with Fred here, we're going to be in for quite a storm in a 
couple of years when users realise the same thing.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email