IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4tov6transition] troubling survey

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 17 September 2010 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807523A6BBD for <v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wzi1KOpOhTQ4 for <v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909CF3A6BB6 for <v4tov6transition@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so1856323qyk.10 for <v4tov6transition@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rI/0oUiTNtFaI4QS340X0PHDHeRlDBDJqEx0YQJuJ8A=; b=b9vppoqEwIOC1RBuPm7rpG27EP2lc5dpKdyVa+ce/dzA6bv7V1eJBPP36w5G4U1/BD o8hJscw7zcJ4ICliCu3nXBF9wK3amZyEJeDIQ/9oY1OlI2wIkMuJ9TWZLU5j5IoRnqaG VXrI9OBQ0aOLqf7HM6Ul3pb2+pKGw4cuW3aX4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NFmZMaJ+wCViVsiO7LOZN22l6bLkYY1Df/FAZR/rkiRmJvFj0Cto+fDBarhHd4GJ6G L49cW5/oFx58rpDafSZ6ZA09HHLYmVSEDZb/R7xqmnpjdgfo2G7ZvYTcHYMNvVu1w7x7 gJKPut48lgpKn+Kgu1ekXDSG73/g1ckMd83nc=
Received: by 10.220.63.79 with SMTP id a15mr2228486vci.201.1284686413798; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e18sm1764280vcf.12.2010.09.16.18.20.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C92C253.4060101@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:20:19 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Yiu L. Lee" <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
References: <C8B804B7.3359E%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8B804B7.3359E%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] troubling survey
X-BeenThere: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <v4tov6transition.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition>
List-Post: <mailto:v4tov6transition@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:19:54 -0000

This is very compatible with the more detailed answers that
we got in draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios, which is now
in the RFC Editor queue.

In particular, the hard core of 10% of ISPs who have no plan
or intention for IPv6 is exactly the same.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2010-09-17 09:30, Yiu L. Lee wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> 
> Thanks for sharing this information to the list.
> 
> When I read the data in the PDF file, it shows some good uptake. On Page 11,
> 57.6% ISP responded "YES" and 32.7% responded "Maybe" to consider promoting
> IPv6. Only 9.7% said "NO". On Page 13, 84.3% responded they would consider
> to allocate IPv6 in 2010. This is pretty high number. What disappointed me a
> little is only 55% responded to make sure IPv6 supported in their products.
> 
> On Page 17, 60% out of 84% who indicated to consider to support IPv6
> responded worry about vendor support of IPv6. This high number may reflect
> the lack of IPv6 support for back office systems and applications. But I
> don't find the detailed breakdown.
> 
> According to this survey, it seems the adoption rate is improving but still
> not as high as we wish. From the data, I would guess the transition period
> may take some good years.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yiu
> 
> 
> On 9/16/10 4:32 PM, "Ed Jankiewicz" <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com> wrote:
> 
>>   http://gcn.com/articles/2010/09/14/adoption-of-ipv6-is-slow.aspx
>>
>> as the article notes, something like 10% of ISPs responded "No plans to
>> implement IPv6" as in not even thinking about EVER doing it.  Overall,
>> including end-user organizations there is still a lackluster interest in
>> doing IPv6 now or soon.  And big reasons include "lack of knowledgeable
>> staff", "lack of experience", "no business case/user demand" and
>> "technical problems".   Real or perceived, getting better information
>> out to marketplace about what you really need to know and need to do
>> would help.  I hope that's what this list is about.
>>
>> http://www.nro.net/documents/GlobalIPv6SurveySummaryv2.pdf
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v4tov6transition mailing list
> v4tov6transition@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email