IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Wed, 06 July 2011 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D4521F8BBD; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id peJ96uyRloII; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde01.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927B821F8BB1; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde01.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id p66Knm35017687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:49:48 +0200 (MEST)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <201107062049.p66Knlfi026308@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
To: dougb@dougbarton.us
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:49:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4E14C31E.4010603@dougbarton.us> from "Doug Barton" at Jul 6, 11 01:18:38 pm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SAP: out
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, mrex@sap.com, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:49:54 -0000

Doug Barton wrote:
> 
> On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
> >
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> > >
> > > I was however willing to accept "historic" as a reasonable compromise.
> >
> > "historic" as a compromise?  Between which two positions?
> 
> Nuking it from orbit, and erecting a statue in its honor?

Which to options that are actually available to the IESG?  I see

extremist-A:  nuke/kill 6to4 by moving 3056/3068 to historic

compromise:   move 3056/3068 off Standards Track,
              i.e. by reclassifying them as Experimental

blocked:      leave 3056/3068 at Proposed, publish only 6to4-advisory

extremist-B:  stick fingers in ears, sing la-la-la, pretend 6to4 is perfect


-Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email