Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 05 July 2011 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B5B21F88BD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5BZI7a3wNQm for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F8421F88AA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LNV000WILNXYN31@mail-out.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c71ae0000014d0-7d-4e1369fb1361
Received: from kencur (kencur.apple.com [17.151.62.38]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id A1.05.05328.BF9631E4; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.193.13.64] (unknown [17.193.13.64]) by kencur.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LNV00490LNXTW40@kencur.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D3F3507EDA@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:47:57 -0700
Message-id: <4D8CA238-E550-4B4A-81C4-1740CC288878@apple.com>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D3F3507EDA@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1OTfd3prCfwel1Uhanj+1ldmD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxpquX4wFq9gqJh/+wdrA2M3axcjJISFgIjH5ywIWCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgLtTBLvP/9gA0nwCghK/Jh8D6iIg4NZQF7i4HlZkDCzgJbE90etLBD1U5gknh1f zQSSEBYwk/iy6DRYL5uAisS3y3fB4pwCPhI3N3Qyg9gsAqoS3zasYIQYpCHx+cYvFohdNhIv 3p0DqxcS8JZY3jsdzBYRUJd4vGoaG8Sh8hKLWz4zTmAUmIXkvFkI581Cct4CRuZVjIJFqTmJ lYYmeokFBTmpesn5uZsYQYHXUGiyg/HgT/5DjAIcjEo8vIEGwn5CrIllxZW5hxglOJiVRHgj LYBCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTEedUzuf2EBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjD0+LHYG qdy8IgvmXzgZ+spD+uZLhrWHXl2dyWultv/x4caZCRcfpMpO7lHNkzzEfdzBc9oPHquVm5ZZ P6zav7fUZSuTpEbyGzf54lJVy0/eISbf+033Smb+V+26lX9czGhRhkaLy+be7HOqP/ltN8xd 19/AbFQ0/2b37H+TmGUc/rypObTumhJLcUaioRZzUXEiAKUTkaY4AgAA
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:48:00 -0000

[distribution narrowed]

On Jul 2, 2011, at 09:36 , Ronald Bonica wrote:
> 
> - The author will introduce a new draft, intended for standards track publication. The new draft will update RFCs 3056 and 3068. It will say that if 6-to-4 is implemented, it must be turned off by default. 
> 
> If anyone objects to this course of action, please speak up soon.

Assuming the details are specified clearly to set the standard that seems to be the IETF consensus, which is to make this default configuration REQUIRED, i.e. what I-D.ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory currently only recommends in all lower-case letters, then I can see how this will be a useful document for IETF to publish and I can support its development.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking