Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt]
Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com> Tue, 10 January 2012 02:45 UTC
Return-Path: <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF70C21F8552 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:45:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KuI3ZIHgiswM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:45:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF5D21F854E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:45:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so3432765vbb.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:45:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y5MdWo91sFvaiDnHC5uGakVHnkVTpbmjNdEvSYzjdU0=; b=J97FASdjmV9WRV/XhkdWYZAQ4Wj4rrbKkq2Cw9qBxggUk8AGDYz3O1++xCHPMPkOTu sNv2ccJ+gL/6TXjw0PAFNvZxgx/My5zn+eY5QM8ES/AZFSqOzDCcESTHaqReZBNDb5Ji x3otON2I58NFQ8oGeeHzukqXTyO+b8zFxiyCc=
Received: by 10.52.33.99 with SMTP id q3mr8681131vdi.100.1326163549613; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.100.89] ([67.224.83.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm11186121vdh.11.2012.01.09.18.45.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:45:48 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:45:45 -0500
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CB310DB1.13F41%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt]
In-Reply-To: <4F0B975E.60604@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:45:51 -0000
Brian, I would support this as a WG item. I think this document outlines sound guidance for considering IPv6 in the environments (ICS / ASP) noted. I would also suggest that sections 3-8 and 11,12 are applicable for more then just the ICS/ASP environment (good general text). The document seems to capture a number of very important points for orgs looking to support IPv6. I would suggest that we may want to consider putting a bit more in section 5.2 (routing) and section 6 (Load balancers) as the document progresses. I.e. For example, in the routing section, perhaps the mention of other protocols such as IS-IS can be mentioned? I would also think there may be some additional guidance that can be given here as to what analysis can/should be done by an org when considering running dual stack. The document suggests that IPv6 routing can be put in without impact to IPv4, but I think that may be simplifying the point a bit. There are considerations that can be highlighted here (I.e. Performance on routers running more protocols, non-congruent IPv4/IPv6 topology considerations, etc). Also, I think much of this text in sections I highlighted above should also be directed to enterprises as it captures many key points of considering IPv6 deployment succinctly. Regards, Victor K On 12-01-09 8:41 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >We've updated this according to the comments received since Taipei. > >At this point we'd like opinions about the future of the document. >Should it become a WG draft, or should we progress it as an >individual submission? > > Brian > >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt >Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:37:09 -0800 >From: internet-drafts@ietf.org >Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org >To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. > > Title : IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and Application >Service Providers > Author(s) : Brian Carpenter > Sheng Jiang > Filename : draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt > Pages : 16 > Date : 2012-01-06 > > This document provides guidance and suggestions for Internet Content > Providers and Application Service Providers who wish to offer their > service to both IPv6 and IPv4 customers. > > >A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02. >txt > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.t >xt > >_______________________________________________ >I-D-Announce mailing list >I-D-Announce@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > >_______________________________________________ >v6ops mailing list >v6ops@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-i… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Leo Liu(bing)
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… George, Wes
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6o… Brian E Carpenter