Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt]

Hi, Brian

I also support this to be a WG item.

I agree with Victor's comment that some of the content not only suitable for ICP, but also enterprise and any other organizations who want to introduce IPv6 to their current network. They need to know the impact to various infrastructures include routing, servers, balancers, CDN etc. I think the draft is quite helpful for them to get start with IPv6, especially for the mid-small sized organizations, who may not have enough IPv6 experience/knowledge. 

For my personal interest, I want to see more discussion of dual stack OPS in the draft, since it seems there always been controversial about the complexity of running dual stack, and I think the issue may be more sensitive for the mid-small organizations.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Victor Kuarsingh
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:46 AM
> To: Brian E Carpenter; IPv6 Operations
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Fwd: I-D Action:
> draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt]
> 
> Brian,
> 
> I would support this as a WG item.
> 
> I think this document outlines sound guidance for considering IPv6 in the
> environments (ICS / ASP) noted.  I would also suggest that sections 3-8
> and 11,12 are applicable for more then just the ICS/ASP environment (good
> general text).
> 
> The document seems to capture a number of very important points for orgs
> looking to support IPv6.  I would suggest that we may want to consider
> putting a bit more in section 5.2 (routing) and section 6 (Load balancers)
> as the document progresses.
> 
> I.e. For example, in the routing section, perhaps the mention of other
> protocols such as IS-IS can be mentioned?  I would also think there may be
> some additional guidance that can be given here as to what analysis
> can/should be done by an org when considering running dual stack.  The
> document suggests that IPv6 routing can be put in without impact to IPv4,
> but I think that may be simplifying the point a bit.  There are
> considerations that can be highlighted here (I.e. Performance on routers
> running more protocols, non-congruent IPv4/IPv6 topology considerations,
> etc).
> 
> Also, I think much of this text in sections I highlighted above should
> also be directed to enterprises as it captures many key points of
> considering IPv6 deployment succinctly.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Victor K
> 
> 
> 
> On 12-01-09 8:41 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >We've updated this according to the comments received since Taipei.
> >
> >At this point we'd like opinions about the future of the document.
> >Should it become a WG draft, or should we progress it as an
> >individual submission?
> >
> >    Brian
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt
> >Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:37:09 -0800
> >From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> >Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> >To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> >
> >
> >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >directories.
> >
> >    Title           : IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and Application
> >Service Providers
> >    Author(s)       : Brian Carpenter
> >                          Sheng Jiang
> >    Filename        : draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.txt
> >    Pages           : 16
> >    Date            : 2012-01-06
> >
> >   This document provides guidance and suggestions for Internet Content
> >   Providers and Application Service Providers who wish to offer their
> >   service to both IPv6 and IPv4 customers.
> >
> >
> >A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.
> >txt
> >
> >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> >This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
> >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance-02.t
> >xt
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >I-D-Announce mailing list
> >I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> >Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> >or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >v6ops mailing list
> >v6ops@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops