IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-long-headers-01.txt

Michael H Lambert <lambert@psc.edu> Fri, 05 July 2013 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lambert@psc.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0738B11E82CD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iyql7YxMZy0W for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer2.psc.edu (mailer2.psc.edu [IPv6:2001:5e8:2:46::6a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5A111E8127 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.69] (c-71-60-91-199.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.91.199]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailer2.psc.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r65FW3iF030999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:32:03 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Michael H Lambert <lambert@psc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <51D6E5F1.3020205@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:32:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <11BB590E-01FE-4BA0-9511-370B8C6F2F29@psc.edu>
References: <20130703235521.17726.15468.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0BDA30D8-AEDC-4E18-8ACE-64A032305F07@kumari.net> <1372897534.35448.YahooMailNeo@web2802.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAD6AjGSGeNHPUs9+F6OOAeDOy_FZpTOGkH6viX_fENca4H8X0g@mail.gmail.com> <1372899240.80312.YahooMailNeo@web2803.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51D614F6.4030000@isi.edu> <51D6A1C9.8030208@inex.ie> <51D6C2FF.4090103@isi.edu> <51D6C509.7040806@inex.ie> <51D6C66E.5060901@isi.edu> <51D6C7D2.6020504@inex.ie> <51D6CBB9.2060200@isi.edu> <51D6D2FF.40305@inex.ie> <51D6D646.7080102@isi.edu> <51D6DE34.2060800@inex.ie> <51D6E5F1.3020205@isi.edu>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-long-headers-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:32:05 -0000

On 5 Jul 2013, at 11:27, Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> wrote:

> It would be useful to start by explaining:
> 
> a) what traffic you need to inspect?
> 	- to the router
> 	- through the router
> 
> Which one determines whether you need to suggest limiting header chains for all traffic or just traffic to your router.

Are hop-by-hop options TO the router, THROUGH the router, or both?

Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email