Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-long-headers-01.txt

Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> Fri, 05 July 2013 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@inex.ie>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EC711E8129 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LP1eluSP2wcv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA6E11E8142 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.dyn.netability.ie (pancake.netability.ie [87.198.142.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r65GXmsh039940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:33:48 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@inex.ie)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host pancake.netability.ie [87.198.142.197] claimed to be crumpet.dyn.netability.ie
Message-ID: <51D6F56C.6000002@inex.ie>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:33:48 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
References: <20130703235521.17726.15468.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0BDA30D8-AEDC-4E18-8ACE-64A032305F07@kumari.net> <1372897534.35448.YahooMailNeo@web2802.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAD6AjGSGeNHPUs9+F6OOAeDOy_FZpTOGkH6viX_fENca4H8X0g@mail.gmail.com> <1372899240.80312.YahooMailNeo@web2803.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51D614F6.4030000@isi.edu> <51D6A1C9.8030208@inex.ie> <51D6C2FF.4090103@isi.edu> <51D6C509.7040806@inex.ie> <51D6C66E.5060901@isi.edu> <51D6C7D2.6020504@inex.ie> <51D6CBB9.2060200@isi.edu> <51D6D2FF.40305@inex.ie> <51D6D646.7080102@isi.edu> <51D6DE34.2060800@inex.ie> <51D6E5F1.3020205@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <51D6E5F1.3020205@isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
X-Company-Info-1: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited. Registered in Ireland No. 253804
X-Company-Info-2: Registered Offices: 1-2, Marino Mart, Fairview, Dublin 3
X-Company-Info-3: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited is limited by guarantee
X-Company-Info-4: Offices: 4027 Kingswood Road, Citywest, Dublin 24.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wkumari-long-headers-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:33:53 -0000

On 05/07/2013 16:27, Joe Touch wrote:
> It would be useful to start by explaining:

I already have, multiple times over the past couple of months, and most
recently in my previous email.

> a) what traffic you need to inspect?
>     - to the router
>     - through the router

Both:
	to: control plane policing / RE firewalling
	through: infrastructure ACLs

Both are equally important to running functional networks and incidentally
both are handled by the same hardware ACL/queueing mechanisms.

> b) what is the problem with inspecting traffic?
> 
>     - the length of the chain
>     - how many 'links' in the chain

On current generation forwarding engines, mostly the length of the chain.

> Neither one has anything to do with whether you use ASICs; they both have
> to do with whether you are space or time limited and in what resource.

I made no claim in this regard.  What I said was that your statement
"claims that this is about a technical problem are false" was absurd.

Nick