IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 23 July 2009 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A0D3A6BAD for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2nlbfubKiMH for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B913A6A42 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MTmik-0006pY-GO for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:03:42 +0000
Received: from [209.85.222.192] (helo=mail-pz0-f192.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>) id 1MTmih-0006oc-1N for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:03:40 +0000
Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so444910pzk.5 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uVhxEz+TgHRDJFnbmRsMmoKWASL7Lwhyul2oQaUVIn8=; b=bJ85VGn4EQrNRdcImXvN72Zh2ybAl67eXtIVbvrLwDBAUTMGlp1OqTu4S2kl+HZN1c uviFNe3lsh39kvTrrCuWRnJPsrmjIp/6Eweo8a9Vb4JVjacWAzNMux30y0ONNa+uLrnR 8sr2+wHv0S0H2tF4dbId5Tf3DaIgW+7dSICSY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=QYV+nDnmU63Yxhiua3YvyxA19l9ysHpVDzVMTAqkyfoAjoJ5iCntgbn6vlg7EVCwhC 2xdl5t0f0QPWPKnw68ixvbhfh4TmkFSw/fcGvyZJy46I/wgKMccuM0MK/Jc1ACHLamRj xWULOeQE+1iFfkDwMG3d1+g739hIj6Tk+RWwQ=
Received: by 10.114.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr1454191wac.72.1248311018344; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l28sm2190525waf.19.2009.07.22.18.03.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A67B6F2.7050608@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:03:46 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Donley <C.Donley@cablelabs.com>
CC: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00
References: <B1ED8A2E683E16479C92C3F4AE13677B01E1A92E@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D07A0270F@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com> <B1ED8A2E683E16479C92C3F4AE13677B01E1AD62@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <B1ED8A2E683E16479C92C3F4AE13677B01E1AD62@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

Chris,

On 2009-07-23 11:03, Chris Donley wrote:
> Hemant,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback.  
> 
> One of the issues that we have with the v6ops CPE Router draft is that
> it is hard to tell what is base functionality, what is optional, and
> what is architecture-dependent.  We present our draft to the working
> group as a complement to the v6ops CPE Router draft to detail our use
> cases, architectural assumptions, and requirements. While this draft is
> specific to our needs, we believe that most of our draft is applicable
> to the wider community, and that a final document should address the use
> cases and requirements of the wider community; we don't presume to speak
> for the Broadband Forum or other groups, and encourage them to share
> their use cases/requirements, as well. 
> 
> As you suggested, there is a significant degree of overlap between our
> respective drafts.  That is intentional.  We tried to align as much as
> possible to avoid confusion. 

But I'm afraid that's impossible. Two overlapping documents = confusion,
by definition. I think the only reasonable goal is a combined document,
or possibly two complementary documents.

It's very encouraging to see use-case driven work in this area of course.
It would be well worth while the effort of integrating the two drafts.

    brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email