IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: New Version Notification for draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 26 July 2009 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C599D3A6B58 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r08JFCq+YmKx for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FE13A6849 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MVBdK-000G5q-9P for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:51:54 +0000
Received: from [2a00:801::f] (helo=uplift.swm.pp.se) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <swmike@swm.pp.se>) id 1MVBdG-000G5P-DH for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:51:52 +0000
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 420249E; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:51:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1429C for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:51:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:51:47 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00
In-Reply-To: <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D07A76B2C@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907262347580.4558@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <B1ED8A2E683E16479C92C3F4AE13677B01E1A92E@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D07A0270F@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com> <B1ED8A2E683E16479C92C3F4AE13677B01E1AD62@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D07A76B2C@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:

> Thanks for all your replies.  Indeed, what Wes and I did in our IETF
> IPv6 CPE Rtr doc is to try and write one common document that works for
> cable, DSL, and even 3GPP legacy wireless data networks (3GPP was
> low-hanging fruit for our document because with a few minor additions we
> could satisfy their demands).

I'd just want to clarify that my intent in my opinions regarding this 
draft was to make it work in ETTH deployments as well. I hope this was 
just an omission in listing technologies and not a statement from the 
authors regarding the intents of the document to exclude ETTH?

I don't know the extent of L2 switches used in delivering ETTH across the 
world, but I'd guess it's in the millions of subscribers getting their 
Internet access this way.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email