Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Operational Guidance-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance

Hi Karsten,

Thanks a lot for your review and comment.
I think your suggestion is good, we'll revise accordingly in the next version.

Best regards,
Bing

From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Karsten Thomann
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 9:49 PM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Operational Guidance-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance

Hi,

I think the draft is useful for everyone who is starting an ipv6 deployment and doesn't know how to handle the flags in the right way.

Notes:

Section 3.1

In my opinion there should be an addional note that DHCPv6 is not anymore a requirement for hosts (RFC6434).

I know it is covered in section 3.2, to make sure all hosts support DHCPv6 but should be also covered as a note at the SLAAC section.

Section 3.3

s/Window 8/ Windows 8/

Best regards

Karsten

Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 07:59:39 schrieb Liubing:

> Hi Dear All,

>

> In ietf88 meeting, we discussed draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem which

> indicated the hosts' behavior might varied on DHCPv6/SLAAC interaction

> caused by ambiguous standard definition. (The draft was adopted as

> ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem after the meeting.)

>

> Since the above draft is only filed as a Problem Statement document, as

> discussed in the meeting, the WG decided to initiate another draft to

> provide some operational guidance of what the administrators should do

> given the fact that the host behavior might varied in some situations.

>

> So this is the 00 version. Hope you can read it and comment.

> Your review and comments would be appreciated very much.

>

> And a late happy new year to you all.

>

> Best regards

> Bing

>

> > -----Original Message-----

> > From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of fred@cisco.com<mailto:fred@cisco.com>

> > Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:45 PM

> > To: v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>

> > Cc: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance@tools.ietf.org>

> > Subject: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance

> >

> >

> > A new draft has been posted, at

> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance. Please

> > take a look at it and comment.

> > _______________________________________________

> > v6ops mailing list

> > v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>

> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

>

> _______________________________________________

> v6ops mailing list

> v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops