Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Operational Guidance-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance

Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> Thu, 09 January 2014 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tore@fud.no>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27F61AE411 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:36:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eFRBWaPyAeiA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from greed.fud.no (greed.fud.no [IPv6:2a02:c0:1001:100::145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197921AE0B4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2a02:fe0:c410:1d30:b6b6:76ff:fe17:2e83] (port=42097 helo=sloth.fud.no) by greed.fud.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tore@fud.no>) id 1W1LP5-0000Bf-SI; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:36:31 +0100
Message-ID: <52CEFA3F.4050603@fud.no>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:36:31 +0100
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <201312251345.rBPDj1u26004@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D827CF1@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr1i56skSnw+MzuYWsf97MwCfavgu2ADm5PyQBQSq4u+KA@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8283E7@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr0RgsL5sF-p_yNKEtCuXC-cTxO3MAZU9fzPFGoACXuRkA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401090702210.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2kxL_TcTXshAu-US4ZHuKhpYza95PK6m=5PJ2juYDT_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401090758240.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr0TnG5Ncc-0CaLY_+x-NGJpeGKpH92ssNDBcBz4Xw-z+g@mail.gmail.com> <52CEC7E4.8060103@inex.ie>
In-Reply-To: <52CEC7E4.8060103@inex.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance@tools.ietf.org, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Interaction Operational Guidance-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:36:48 -0000

* Nick Hilliard

> Can you provide a reference for the assumption that the host will define
> the netmask to be /128 if it receives an address assignment from DHCPv6
> without a specific subnet mask assignment via RA?

http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc5942#section-5

Tore