RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com> Fri, 06 March 2009 04:06 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13833A6BE3 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:06:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.081
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jcw+SGBbzXGz for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725CC3A6B85 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1LfRHn-000BqB-Jt for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:03:47 +0000
Received: from [119.145.14.67] (helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <shengjiang@huawei.com>) id 1LfRHi-000BpS-10 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:03:44 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KG200M51GM4PE@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:03:40 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KG200964GM43Z@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:03:40 +0800 (CST)
Received: from J66104 ([10.111.12.219]) by szxml05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KG2006OVGM3IK@szxml05-in.huawei.com> for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:03:40 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:03:39 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
In-reply-to: <110c01c99e03$c46343a0$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
To: 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>
Cc: 'IPv6 Operations' <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, guoseu@huawei.com, brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
Message-id: <021d01c99e10$888458d0$db0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcmdcKeRcryZ/MspT8qEcavULU5jWgAA1IrwACOcU6AAAwEyYA==
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>
>From: Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com] >> We can fix it in 01 version by putting v6ops into the draft name. > >Renaming a draft starts it at -00. Thanks, we can rename it with 00 and WG name. >Anyway, regarding your draft: it says that the CGN has to >terminate the 6-over-4 tunnel. Couldn't some other device -- >not necessarily the CGN -- terminate that tunnel? If so, then >I believe your proposal is very much just a NAT44 ("CGN") and >a 6-over-4 tunnel from the in-home gateway to some device that >terminates the tunnel and has IPv6 Internet connectivity. >This tunnel concentrator might belong to the ISP providing >IPv4 service, but it might also be offered by someone else on >the Internet (as a separate service), in which case the >6-over-4 tunnel might actually go *across* the service >provider's NAT44 ("CGN"). Yes, your understanding is right. NAT44 and 6-over-4 tunnel can be splitted. They are separate technologies. In our proposal, we suggest to integrate NAT44 and 6-over-4 tunnel into a same device box (CGN) so that ISPs can deploy it with a clear IPv6 migration strategy. Here, we may extend the concept of CGN a little bit. When we talk about CGN, we are actually referring to a carrier-grade device, which integrates NAT functions and other integrated technologies. Best regards, Sheng >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com] >> >Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:55 PM >> >To: Sheng Jiang >> >Cc: 'IPv6 Operations'; 'Brian Carpenter' >> >Subject: Re: Agenda issue >> > >> >OK. I truly wish you had put the working group moniker in the >> >draft name (individual submission to a named working group), >> >as it is hard to keep track of work in a working group with >> >individual submission names. >> > >> >On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Sheng Jiang wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, Fred, >> >> >> >> We have submitted a new draft, >> >draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00. I think >> >> we are already on the vows agenda. Are we? If no yet, please >> >count us >> >> in. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Sheng >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org >> >>> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker >> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:16 AM >> >>> To: IPv6 Operations >> >>> Subject: Agenda issue >> >>> >> >>> I have gotten a number of folks asking for time on the >> >agenda, but I >> >>> have a problem: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 19268 Sep 10 05:33 >draft-ietf-v6ops-ra- >> >>> guard-01.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 61870 Sep 29 08:52 draft-miyata-v6ops- >> >>> snatpt-02.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 48468 Oct 1 10:58 draft-endo-v6ops- >> >>> dnsproxy-01.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 43841 Oct 15 10:48 draft-ietf-v6ops- >> >>> tunnel- >> >>> security-concerns- >> >>> 01.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 18562 Oct 15 10:48 >> draft-krishnan-v6ops- >> >>> teredo-update-04.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 53090 Oct 30 10:22 >> >draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe- >> >>> router-03.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 36662 Nov 3 10:15 >> >draft-bajko-v6ops-port- >> >>> restricted-ipaddr-a >> >>> ssign-02.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 48973 Nov 3 11:06 >> draft-luo-v6ops-6man- >> >>> shim6-lbam-00.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 30429 Nov 3 14:26 draft-chown-v6ops- >> >>> rogue- >> >>> ra-02.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 134587 Nov 3 16:14 >> >>> draft-thaler-v6ops- teredo-extensions-02.tx t >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 16462 Feb 17 14:52 >> draft-rgaglian-v6ops- >> >>> v6inixp-01.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 9716 Feb 18 08:01 >> draft-denis-v6ops-nat- >> >>> addrsel-00.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 41369 Feb 23 22:05 draft-bnss-v6ops- >> >>> upnp-00.txt >> >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 19211 Mar 4 14:11 >> >draft-vyncke-vdv-v6ops- >> >>> conf-stats-00.txt >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I see four new drafts post-Minneapolis. The Rogue RA and Teredo >> >>> drafts, whose last call completed several months ago and >> >the write-up >> >>> is awaiting new drafts, don't have new drafts. >> >>> >> >>> Hello? Anyone out there? I need new drafts (cut-off date >> is Friday) >> >>> for anything folks expect to discuss in the WG meeting... >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >
- Agenda issue Fred Baker
- RE: Agenda issue Sheng Jiang
- Re: Agenda issue Fred Baker
- RE: Agenda issue Sheng Jiang
- draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Dan Wing
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Sheng Jiang
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Templin, Fred L
- Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Fred Baker
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Dan Wing
- Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Brian Carpenter
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Dan Wing
- Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Sheng Jiang
- Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Agenda issue Tim Chown
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Stark, Barbara
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda issue) JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Maglione Roberta
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda iss… Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Mark Smith
- Re: draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda iss… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Maglione Roberta
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Stark, Barbara
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Dan Wing
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Dan Wing
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Antonio Querubin
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft james woodyatt
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Stark, Barbara
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft james woodyatt
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Rémi Després
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Rémi Després
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Antonio Querubin
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Mark Townsley
- Re: Tunnel MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Tunnel MTU Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Mark Townsley
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Mohacsi Janos
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L