draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Fri, 06 March 2009 02:37 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C6828C190 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:37:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.352, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dmyq1u0yAJet for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C08B28C146 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:37:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1LfPrN-0006gJ-1X for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:32:25 +0000
Received: from [171.71.176.70] (helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dwing@cisco.com>) id 1LfPrG-0006fl-DW for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:32:21 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,311,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="151678196"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2009 02:32:17 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n262WHkc008611; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:32:17 -0800
Received: from dwingwxp01 (dhcp-171-70-247-3.cisco.com [171.70.247.3]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n262WHTR028646; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 02:32:17 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Sheng Jiang' <shengjiang@huawei.com>
Cc: 'IPv6 Operations' <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, 'Brian Carpenter' <brian@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, guoseu@huawei.com, brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
References: <7FAE1435-0FE1-4C23-B8BF-151D58AF5341@cisco.com> <01d401c99d74$c9600490$db0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Subject: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:32:17 -0800
Message-ID: <110c01c99e03$c46343a0$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
In-Reply-To: <01d401c99d74$c9600490$db0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Thread-Index: AcmdcKeRcryZ/MspT8qEcavULU5jWgAA1IrwACOcU6A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=4406; t=1236306737; x=1237170737; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 |Sender:=20; bh=7A+BQNjem1z2ZoKdHutZ/gyT4KYFA05ntlACSU0wyrM=; b=BLjiZk+KTfmhX1ifZ1Irm3IKTO3uEtyZ1OepXD5m3Y9icBIqWrxnuDbP1v XZetse4Fxnpbw6qfAefHzWcavOIuy2kFnYGSqw6R+KvNxUvVw6OfBO1qOLsi FbOt76fSN0QSzUbZyNGNY+NqjZ3nQsaqTXKCvj4H4ESC7TqH1lqeM=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org > [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:29 AM > To: 'Fred Baker' > Cc: 'IPv6 Operations'; 'Brian Carpenter' > Subject: RE: Agenda issue > > For sure. We know the draft name rules. When we wrote the > draft, we were not sure > which WG it should be submitted. It seems relevant to both > v6ops and behave. As a BEHAVE co-chair, I haven't seen a request for agenda time for draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00, nor any discussion about the draft on the BEHAVE mailing list. > We can fix it in 01 version by putting v6ops into the draft name. Renaming a draft starts it at -00. Anyway, regarding your draft: it says that the CGN has to terminate the 6-over-4 tunnel. Couldn't some other device -- not necessarily the CGN -- terminate that tunnel? If so, then I believe your proposal is very much just a NAT44 ("CGN") and a 6-over-4 tunnel from the in-home gateway to some device that terminates the tunnel and has IPv6 Internet connectivity. This tunnel concentrator might belong to the ISP providing IPv4 service, but it might also be offered by someone else on the Internet (as a separate service), in which case the 6-over-4 tunnel might actually go *across* the service provider's NAT44 ("CGN"). -d > Best regards, > > Sheng > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com] > >Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:55 PM > >To: Sheng Jiang > >Cc: 'IPv6 Operations'; 'Brian Carpenter' > >Subject: Re: Agenda issue > > > >OK. I truly wish you had put the working group moniker in the > >draft name (individual submission to a named working group), > >as it is hard to keep track of work in a working group with > >individual submission names. > > > >On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Sheng Jiang wrote: > > > >> Hi, Fred, > >> > >> We have submitted a new draft, > >draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00. I think > >> we are already on the vows agenda. Are we? If no yet, please > >count us > >> in. > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> Sheng > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org > >>> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker > >>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:16 AM > >>> To: IPv6 Operations > >>> Subject: Agenda issue > >>> > >>> I have gotten a number of folks asking for time on the > >agenda, but I > >>> have a problem: > >>> > >>> > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 19268 Sep 10 05:33 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra- > >>> guard-01.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 61870 Sep 29 08:52 draft-miyata-v6ops- > >>> snatpt-02.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 48468 Oct 1 10:58 draft-endo-v6ops- > >>> dnsproxy-01.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 43841 Oct 15 10:48 draft-ietf-v6ops- > >>> tunnel- > >>> security-concerns- > >>> 01.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 18562 Oct 15 10:48 > draft-krishnan-v6ops- > >>> teredo-update-04.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 53090 Oct 30 10:22 > >draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe- > >>> router-03.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 36662 Nov 3 10:15 > >draft-bajko-v6ops-port- > >>> restricted-ipaddr-a > >>> ssign-02.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 48973 Nov 3 11:06 > draft-luo-v6ops-6man- > >>> shim6-lbam-00.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 30429 Nov 3 14:26 draft-chown-v6ops- > >>> rogue- > >>> ra-02.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 134587 Nov 3 16:14 > >>> draft-thaler-v6ops- teredo-extensions-02.tx t > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 16462 Feb 17 14:52 > draft-rgaglian-v6ops- > >>> v6inixp-01.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 9716 Feb 18 08:01 > draft-denis-v6ops-nat- > >>> addrsel-00.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 41369 Feb 23 22:05 draft-bnss-v6ops- > >>> upnp-00.txt > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 19211 Mar 4 14:11 > >draft-vyncke-vdv-v6ops- > >>> conf-stats-00.txt > >>> > >>> > >>> I see four new drafts post-Minneapolis. The Rogue RA and Teredo > >>> drafts, whose last call completed several months ago and > >the write-up > >>> is awaiting new drafts, don't have new drafts. > >>> > >>> Hello? Anyone out there? I need new drafts (cut-off date > is Friday) > >>> for anything folks expect to discuss in the WG meeting... > >>> > >> > > > >
- Agenda issue Fred Baker
- RE: Agenda issue Sheng Jiang
- Re: Agenda issue Fred Baker
- RE: Agenda issue Sheng Jiang
- draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Dan Wing
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Sheng Jiang
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Templin, Fred L
- Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Fred Baker
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Dan Wing
- Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Brian Carpenter
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Dan Wing
- Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Sheng Jiang
- Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Agenda issue Tim Chown
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Stark, Barbara
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda issue) JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Maglione Roberta
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda iss… Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Mark Smith
- Re: draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda iss… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Maglione Roberta
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Stark, Barbara
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft teemu.savolainen
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Dan Wing
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Dan Wing
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Antonio Querubin
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft james woodyatt
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Stark, Barbara
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft james woodyatt
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Rémi Després
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Rémi Després
- RE: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Antonio Querubin
- Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft Fred Baker
- Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Mark Townsley
- Re: Tunnel MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Tunnel MTU Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Mark Townsley
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L
- Re: Tunnel MTU Mohacsi Janos
- RE: Tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L