IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs-02.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 05 March 2018 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7CD126D45 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 00:07:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vC9nAclqJXUH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 00:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C700126579 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 00:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id q83so13963365wme.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:07:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5nR4HHoZp7aFYYIqxIpARWbSGHODQQ5lUAaruZdGF5M=; b=KrF43ydw6u4OdXg96l0vd2a6aRBB5GvH83PWiugUtZFu4+o2UFDNfxkYPbUg7EvFKJ sFYD2N5G9sx9IKxuABpTi0Ap0sBKOO7KIon9FVl9zNpx3hJ46rlrBC1bL4Nrk1pd4uSL cxJ9H2QbKD+LZJKtNjiud1W552XB86Xb/dArSegMWhbVH9drGjnAJouo2KQAb3iaMAEw /y6X3Qw++ho1/iS4tvj7SWkh10Cv3FkjE7QFq5100WJbgPVP6EznTotGiNklEC+QEXuV VHRJSSztOPugOm767IMw0yO4lrXAbIIWEz+I3RRuC7t14KYS+1fgMl7PgFof+hsetGTn nqmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5nR4HHoZp7aFYYIqxIpARWbSGHODQQ5lUAaruZdGF5M=; b=mxfMY6ZxIgE2WDaJ5QzpbbBjQOt6H9DfiQ4KCJwdRoEb7FDsyMmf+xxlaexMNGyKch mPyPcHvPq+xvpO6r1N6179cA6IUEule3RcTLWqJRTK7C3bXmNhJxsGSErZ1Rv7lfvcgX D0eI5pfpRAvFWo59Tc5NB66jGwaoQyQBWZ064JqHr/+n+Mjb+9/EEqyCaR9BqIz38Hiy dRmlrucUqyPlkNV4ac1EHlk8zWNSGtqvoK5DOdi8ean48CR4oN/8eZDp/hDUNPbsB/b1 JKSRF+yIeQtGouwqpS3fWyXawylW0pwJ0ZgWOFPpH91I8pB1ekjenL0FoG2Du4Jj7zY0 uLjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GQRI2zp6Uvqe3+sJCBL3LrbqmExtvHjZkhwBLixXZg9EmYeTR4 1PrD+FsCi0lCnLZD6JT9oOBoEkHMoNc0px5IuUU7P34J
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsLmLhoG+qoJCKR+7+xQ43/C0f8aJlJgY5CU9oPUp0oEUyR3OmwU/CHBnhut21ZvEIuoZJ+iRRo/YPyRY63xHA=
X-Received: by 10.28.182.212 with SMTP id g203mr6998362wmf.155.1520237245493; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:07:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.63.79 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 00:07:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <EB995E83-5FEE-4025-B82C-4942AE54D3AD@isc.org>
References: <152021615239.27925.6946415833371012617@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr00qjz7z8VF5=WeZ+baBPxJfmnYVhvNqKn_m7gu9H2GTA@mail.gmail.com> <0E0957B6-FA65-4CB0-965F-832699118204@isc.org> <CAKD1Yr3eLjO4vdQLjJgi2M=kyO_P9Mpw99ctY06GbzPFZZ6V5g@mail.gmail.com> <9C6ADA3B-8EC8-4E30-94C9-36285A9FFCCA@isc.org> <CAKD1Yr1u8Ph5+Pr52YO6nf6qxEDXZmS=-1-aUwUzVK1M_iB26g@mail.gmail.com> <02EF1B15-1344-4316-8F96-3105D82F4E4D@isc.org> <20180305084214.6389aec9@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <9E282363-869B-49D5-AD90-B7AA38EAF606@isc.org> <CAKD1Yr2NzGQP3YL=Uf3aoRHRVB1Z6GWjC21v98pPEU9JjsKfqQ@mail.gmail.com> <EB995E83-5FEE-4025-B82C-4942AE54D3AD@isc.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:07:04 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0GnOZ1H_oS23kco4UOfckxFuU-7R-dUvgZGrtdqF=OGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148f228fea1450566a5d070"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/B9-8NvwfQq6kZs58U3rDlOBGgEk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 08:07:29 -0000

"Let's add another IPv6 address range because our configuration protocols
can't update the one we have."

Seems like the wrong solution.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

>
> > On 5 Mar 2018, at 6:56 pm, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> > > You're forgetting that the network could be torn down for all sorts of
> > > reasons outside the phone's control, like driving through a tunnel.
> > > When you emerge from the tunnel 10 seconds later, the phone might
> > > receive a new /64.
> >
> > So?  The existing /64 is STILL valid. You just have 2 prefixes.
> >
> > No you don't, the network is free to assign the old one to someone else.
>
> Again there is NOTHING stopping the phone advertising itself over a ULA
> prefix even if it is tearing down the prefixes from upstream.
>
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email