IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs-02.txt

<7riw77@gmail.com> Sat, 10 March 2018 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFBB120724; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 03:11:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id msEBEj4qtMrO; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 03:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82041124217; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 03:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k21so2373388ioc.2; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 03:11:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=tYnruAZbCp6fiE9JiTZNnGygXg5paFy37Z8iAy66h+A=; b=AV+F7xj8kpbaBJTVvVG1hC+8BVmFOR1I7z6/4v+xHa4oabSAfJ1rHmJ+AZ+Yt5nL8Z KM51DHsS0qEOm+dwem3xAMmrE7m/1l+yvZLs6htzVGIHLP/hTX9tWdvz76qLTNpfo3bV 12g/VfvL0NAB77kwOmtzll7tTdGq+MJkg54BINLz3yGAUTl4W48/nkOlUczlwt1dH4OA P9uVIcP3JIdK1at6Gii/GWS7o8Z4MUg726taZ6+xU/PRhvXycTYNPYyLmq6CP5gmpTTZ lJi/NHV7Q5Coupea0IbgQ+nTMfjieQurkjK7fceXAV/mr/wmYkBMuuYQwueAKorQllfn 67Rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=tYnruAZbCp6fiE9JiTZNnGygXg5paFy37Z8iAy66h+A=; b=NqdqDzMyCBz1DHixdmGp2gpMAnLl9ExwgL7dDI2qjWz/72ANqVMFtH3YS+bw13YFJt 96sMe1BlJesycyUylt289LRU5l4EMzXyPjJjdSHdKW0naHqQtwp402AIJms2gTbrrA9U Bs7KOeK01MlnKGSDH6cDuDhH5gnIBHZ+M7cHtCwIIcVroYc1xcowHBXm5slsxU8Tc5Kd qRjBHSvM4tqrDslcA3apgT4VFsidkyUPI8PCVo81fcdnX2ZUblVI33UhyI91L+QyAVjx d6efb6KkdLflN5rVxon92NL5VfmKCLLNpZ/S7lRkEL87nbY5Y4VlQlEXDh5w5OMUfztv HFiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FF807uBg5eFA+q2gp7mKdW5qK3cvRnbSkMY0ADYLSj6tBICEVH oevkrMeAdW4tD3u5eLo8cxZtDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELswaic5ecCx6LmeNTzV+i8jp+sXWl4w1VrnV5Y5bdTI+8v8qwREO+I16J9IZ371zzM+7N4GuQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.101.8 with SMTP id z8mr1702315iob.279.1520680273719; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 03:11:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Russ ([2600:1700:720:1050:153d:411e:bd7c:8be7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u77sm518022ita.30.2018.03.10.03.11.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Mar 2018 03:11:13 -0800 (PST)
From: 7riw77@gmail.com
To: 'Lorenzo Colitti' <lorenzo@google.com>, 'internet-drafts' <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
References: <152021615239.27925.6946415833371012617@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr00qjz7z8VF5=WeZ+baBPxJfmnYVhvNqKn_m7gu9H2GTA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr00qjz7z8VF5=WeZ+baBPxJfmnYVhvNqKn_m7gu9H2GTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:11:14 -0500
Message-ID: <00b901d3b860$81e731e0$85b595a0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFOj4SCAN8kJXBrD1a3n5TRO1DFbAHIesC0pMVcclA=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/X-S4fF-HnHdTPqN-ujxdrvb7Ckg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 11:11:16 -0000

 
> Saying that mobile phones must support DHCPv6 is harmful, because:

Saying that a mobile phone is a router _designed_ to forward IPv6 packets, when it clearly only forwards these packets incidentally, seems like a stretch, however.  

> this document? If so, I would suggest adding an applicability statement that
> clarifies that not every piece of equipment under the sun that ever happens
> to forward an IPv6 packet must meet these requirements.

If you can write such an applicability statement, beyond what is already in there, that does not essentially make the document pointless, please suggest text. What is there, at this point, already makes the draft non-normative, as there is apparently no possible way to write a normative set of requirements for anything relating to IPv6 -- every deployment is apparently a special snowflake with nothing in common other than the number of bits in the address.

😊 /r

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email