Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-naveen-slaac-prefix-management-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 25 November 2018 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ADE124BE5; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9rxllpxREMor; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9FA21200B3; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id w73so5469937pfk.10; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o+ogKz384afFenfvnopW7Pl9u31vSdm67YlWQZk2aDc=; b=Eau32czC6vT95QJ7ErKYdy4Z5/1m8RxRPH+ZaSC59awIzowq/c0iKT4ph/cN02ZpzR 0qAvPTBSd3DBAdY1LLHidgJZzLy47IQsifKjZDq+z+JCu9cjIUAJPeefopq+FO/h7K2r Ql/76jBw9y1pa36uDrctAA5nhtLkUM7sfhg0/Fy9fesyX7MgSah4p2QHSuHfgPDE7XxV LOD6igZazFHn92oKTvSezOq1PbmM9/yD5Y4ZclX98XthR06aPYeJcoBaR0GGk0j0xfs6 unj1GcU75b0+24QdWciOrj59rgMHnWLArFppaqNYGmJrmA0TMQZm4RXgS7reGbkud0kk 0lNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o+ogKz384afFenfvnopW7Pl9u31vSdm67YlWQZk2aDc=; b=PlgR8rWegctIvyEnQRW202+Vqpj4X1LF8Hh9N0r0LTIKSzObsDev/SUrFYPJsxjAj1 7Y7KrZ5UDBpGdOo6nDZEeyiTviTslgnGIYFFCExW0kgr/U4Gexn3tXXqpQ11D+DW8RMu eRIFUQfdSI8JIUDgA7PUkcst2yjsUkcYi+idLj5RnrLkI83mROvpwi/n+2qvx+eO69zN b4RZ2K0q9GQcrO9eCAB/koimMN2PmJB6oBPIuViwuO39q2swY9FzoknkesUeq1YNM8a8 hll/JAE9vM7Rgp+b8K0sfiCdtcdRZVloJW+fq2Ubz80zhne1RePfMhLYRSBh0w4448ef vUow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWavFmBtVBFkj+HhORKInOt7JHXIsNzXfJmPG3NsrpYw7k2IsCo7 BjGHAjbMV3B7Wltytu+B9R1FfKbT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UHb1PQsUIDnjs/AUwzSEB0NuMeFXj8AeKuBdnmHUKUaTrOXYDl+a1nXT0quf834JxjUvTg2A==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:65c9:: with SMTP id y9mr7173608pgv.438.1543174002982; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.76.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21-v6sm43183706pfk.186.2018.11.25.11.26.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:42 -0800 (PST)
To: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <154155148848.30897.17784898234776136208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211708220.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <51084397aa90410684c599a2cb1953d0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211724550.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <275c824aec1c46c9a4fd4775e97fa127@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211903140.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <ccb7ae3b97c8430eb2422b2ed3c4505c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211920230.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0f1eab2127ce49d2a7f3da56b053c741@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <0c56d7eb-e7a3-0640-9612-176c595897d0@gmail.com> <b8b6689d2cfe4985bfb8634661890674@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811220617270.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <7bbb7a430084407f801d0becaaa2906d@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811250713500.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAO42Z2yrom7eL3EHsvuhixSce0xigNJWm=XzfumfwtqQscn8+w@mail.gmail.com> <CANFmOtm0_UiFMgBmaSLfSgKCrPG-j9UjCfojFFGAFDPqcAvKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <32e65875-6cbc-f180-4456-7a4b1a4cae50@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:26:37 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANFmOtm0_UiFMgBmaSLfSgKCrPG-j9UjCfojFFGAFDPqcAvKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/B_g7lSatDG8jiMydXFyiiuXD070>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-naveen-slaac-prefix-management-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:26:46 -0000

On 2018-11-26 05:44, Naveen Kottapalli wrote:
> Just adding my 2 cents.
> 
> Even in our gateway we have both SLAAC and DHCPv6.  For better routing of
> subscriber traffic, though these are two different protocols we had to
> assign a single prefix for each device.  In case of SLAAC we let the device
> leverage the complete 128 bit address generation and in DHCPv6 case, our
> box generates the 128 bit address using the same prefix, map against DUID
> and sends back to the devices.  In the last 5-6 years of production till
> now we have not seen any device requesting more than 1 IA_NA and even our
> gateway does not support more than 1 DHCPv6 address; whereas all the
> devices which got the SLAAC prefix used at most 16 addresses.

How will all this work when the subscribers are homenets that need
/56 or /48 prefixes?

     Brian
> 
> Yours,
> Naveen.
> 
> 
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 13:16, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 17:16, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 24 Nov 2018, Templin (US), Fred L wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you think we should bring back RAAN?
>>>
>>> Yes, but also note that the relay behavior is my least concern with the
>>> DHCP+RA combination. The ships in the night problem between leasetimers
>>> (DHCP) and lifetimes (RA) is a much bigger concern for me.
>>>
>>
>> (I haven't followed this thread, apologies if it has been covered.)
>>
>> In this scenario, I assume the DHCPv6 server is selecting the prefix
>> to delegate, and the BRAS is acting as a DHCPv6 relay, which is why
>> the BRAS has to glean the delegated prefix to then be able to announce
>> it into the routing domain? Are the delegated prefixes dynamic or
>> static, and if they're static (or at least stable across
>> disconnect/connect), is it correct that the CPE's DUID is being used
>> to re-issue the same delegated prefix?
>>
>> The reason I ask is that the IPv6 residential broadband deployment I
>> worked on achieved this without gleaning via two methods:
>>
>> - for static delegated prefixes, the prefix is supplied as part of the
>> RADIUS authentication response, which the BRAS DHCPv6 server then uses
>> for DHCPv6-PD, and the BRAS can then announce into the routing domain
>>
>> - for dynamic delegated prefixes, the RADIUS server provided a pool
>> name to allocate from, with each BRAS having a local pool with that
>> name. At the time the pool name was a proprietary RADIUS attribute,
>> however there is now an IETF attribute for the pool name specified in
>> RFCRFC6911.
>>
>>
>> An alternative idea, although probably more medium term, would be to
>> have the CPE's receive the prefix via DHCPv6-PD, and then the CPE
>> advertises the prefix itself, using automatically established eBGP
>> sessions via a well known Link-Local anycast address.
>>
>> "IPv6 Formal Anycast Addresses and Functional Anycast Addresses"
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-6man-form-func-anycast-addresses-00
>>
>> "5.7.3.  Automatic eBGP Session Establishment"
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-6man-form-func-anycast-addresses-00#section-5.7.3
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>